Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32754706›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2020

Removing abuse-prone prescription medication from fueling the national opioid crisis through community engagement and surgeon leadership: results of a local drug take-back event.

Fady Moustarah, Jay Pragneshbhai Desai, John Blebea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Unused medicine take-back programmes: a systematic review.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fady MoustarahDepartment of Surgery, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, Michigan.
Jay Pragneshbhai DesaiResearch student & clinical observer, c/o Dr. Moustarah at Ascension St. Mary's Hospital and Covenant Healthcare.
John BlebeaDepartment of Surgery, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address the national opioid and death from overdose crisis in the United States, take-back programs were created to collect and properly dispose of unused abuse-prone drugs.

methodsSurgeons at Central Michigan University College of Medicine led a community prescription medication take-back drive, administered surveys, characterized event participant demographics, prescription indications, and type and quantity of medications dropped off for disposal.

resultsA total of 74,363 dosing units of unused medication were brought in from the homes of 104 event participants. Returned opioids were often prescribed after surgery. Hydrocodone was collected most. Unused opioids were frequently available in homes with children or youth. Collected opioids and benzodiazepines alone had an estimated trademark retail value of over $20,000.

conclusionThis surgeon-led public health initiative helped properly dispose a significant amount of unneeded abuse-prone prescription medicine. It highlighted the presence of excess opioid prescribing in a typical Midwestern community. Issues related to improved physician prescribing, utility of take-back drives, and proper drug disposal to avoid misappropriation and abuse by younger generations are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID32754706
PMCPMC7391882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.