Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32754690›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2019

Outcomes of peritoneal dialysis catheter configurations and pelvic fixation.

Yash K Pandya, Jason K Wagner, Theodore Yuo, Mohammad Eslami, Michael J Singh, Eric S Hager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yash K PandyaSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Jason K WagnerDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Theodore YuoDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Mohammad EslamiDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Michael J SinghDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Eric S HagerDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter placement has expanded indications, although a relative paucity of data exists about the best configuration for improving outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of different catheter configurations and pelvic fixation on catheter and patient outcomes.

methodsRetrospective chart review of patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. All procedures were conducted laparoscopically at a single center. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata/SE 14.2.

resultsBuried catheter configuration was a statistically significant predictor of peritonitis compared to unburied configuration (P = 0.008). Buried catheter was exteriorized at 100 days (SD 107.8). A longer length of time to exteriorization significantly correlated with peritonitis, need for revision, and need for revision pelvic fixation (P < 0.05). Additionally, initial pelvic fixation was a significant predictor of revision (HR 3.94).

conclusionsPeritoneal dialysis catheter placement via a laparoscopic approach can be successfully performed in a diverse patient mix with positive results. However, buried catheter configuration and prophylactic pelvic fixation should be carefully employed in select patients.

Identifiers

PMID32754690
PMCPMC7391890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.