Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32754662›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT2018

Cross-cultural adaptation of Dimensions of Corporate Well-Being Scorecard to the Brazilian Portuguese language.

João Massuda Junior, Liliana Andolpho Magalhães Guimarães, Rodrigo Bornhausen Demarch, Fernando Faleiros de Oliveira, Alfredo Almeida Pina-Oliveira, Marcia Cristina das Dores Bandini, Angela Cristina Yano, Alberto José Niituma Ogata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

João Massuda JuniorGraduate Psychology Program, Dom Bosco Catholic University (Universidade Católica Dom Bosco - Campo Grande (MS), Brazil.
Liliana Andolpho Magalhães GuimarãesGraduate Psychology Program, Dom Bosco Catholic University (Universidade Católica Dom Bosco - Campo Grande (MS), Brazil.
Rodrigo Bornhausen DemarchAssociação Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho (ANAMT) - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Fernando Faleiros de OliveiraGraduate Psychology Program, Dom Bosco Catholic University (Universidade Católica Dom Bosco - Campo Grande (MS), Brazil.
Alfredo Almeida Pina-OliveiraGraduate Nursing Program, University of Guarulhos - Guarulhos (SP), Brazil.
Marcia Cristina das Dores BandiniTechnical Committee for Occupational Health Promotion, ANAMT - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Angela Cristina YanoTechnical Committee for Occupational Health Promotion, ANAMT - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Alberto José Niituma OgataTechnical Committee for Occupational Health Promotion, ANAMT - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integration of occupational risk management initiatives and health promotion and well-being in the workplace poses a challenge to organizations from different sectors.

objectiveCross-cultural adaptation of the

methodThe process of cross-cultural adaptation of the

resultsThe stringent protocols adopted in the present study resulted in a satisfactory and adequate instrument to analyze programs which target workers' health, safety and well-being at organizations operating in Brazil.

conclusionThe Brazilian version of DCWS, entitled

Indexed as

health promotionoccupational healthsafetysurveys and questionnairestranslation

Identifiers

PMID32754662
PMCPMC7394535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.