Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32754131›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Species Boundaries and Molecular Markers for the Classification of 16SrI Phytoplasmas Inferred by Genome Analysis.

Shu-Ting Cho, Hung-Jui Kung, Weijie Huang, Saskia A Hogenhout, Chih-Horng Kuo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. First molecular evidence ofVeterinary world · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Divergence within the Taxon 'Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparative Genome Analysis of 'Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shu-Ting ChoInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hung-Jui KungInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Weijie HuangDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Saskia A HogenhoutDepartment of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Chih-Horng KuoInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica · TWJohn Innes Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytoplasmas are plant-pathogenic bacteria that impact agriculture worldwide. The commonly adopted classification system for phytoplasmas is based on the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of their 16S rRNA genes. With the increased availability of phytoplasma genome sequences, the classification system can now be refined. This work examined 11 strains in the 16SrI group within the genus '

Indexed as

average nucleotide diversitycomparative genomicseffectormultilocus sequence analysisplant pathogentaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID32754131
PMCPMC7366425
OpenAlexW3042031783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.