Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32754095›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2020

Environmentally Sustainable Food Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda From a Goal-Directed Perspective.

Iris Vermeir, Bert Weijters, Jan De Houwer, Maggie Geuens, Hendrik Slabbinck, Adriaan Spruyt, Anneleen Van Kerckhove, Wendy Van Lippevelde, Hans De Steur, Wim Verbeke

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From Sustainability Consciousness to Sustainable Dietary Behaviours: The Mediating Roles of Food Waste and Food Preference.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Iris VermeirBE4LIFE, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Bert WeijtersBE4LIFE, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jan De HouwerBE4LIFE, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Maggie GeuensBE4LIFE, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Hendrik SlabbinckBE4LIFE, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Adriaan SpruytBE4LIFE, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Anneleen Van KerckhoveBE4LIFE, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Wendy Van LippeveldeBE4LIFE, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Hans De SteurBE4LIFE, Department of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Wim VerbekeBE4LIFE, Department of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The challenge of convincing people to change their eating habits toward more environmentally sustainable food consumption (ESFC) patterns is becoming increasingly pressing. Food preferences, choices and eating habits are notoriously hard to change as they are a central aspect of people's lifestyles and their socio-cultural environment. Many people already hold positive attitudes toward sustainable food, but the notable gap between favorable attitudes and actual purchase and consumption of more sustainable food products remains to be bridged. The current work aims to (1) present a comprehensive theoretical framework for future research on ESFC, and (2) highlight behavioral solutions for environmental challenges in the food domain from an interdisciplinary perspective. First, starting from the premise that food consumption is deliberately or unintentionally directed at attaining goals, a goal-directed framework for understanding and influencing ESFC is built. To engage in goal-directed behavior, people typically go through a series of sequential steps. The proposed theoretical framework makes explicit the sequential steps or hurdles that need to be taken for consumers to engage in ESFC. Consumers need to positively value the environment, discern a discrepancy between the desired versus the actual state of the environment, opt for action to reduce the experienced discrepancy, intend to engage in behavior that is expected to bring them closer to the desired end state, and act in accordance with their intention. Second, a critical review of the literature on mechanisms that underlie and explain ESFC (or the lack thereof) in high-income countries is presented and integrated into the goal-directed framework. This contribution thus combines a top-down conceptualization with a bottom-up literature review; it identifies and discusses factors that might hold people back from ESFC and interventions that might promote ESFC; and it reveals knowledge gaps as well as insights on how to encourage both short- and long-term ESFC by confronting extant literature with the theoretical framework. Altogether, the analysis yields a set of 33 future research questions in the interdisciplinary food domain that deserve to be addressed with the aim of fostering ESFC in the short and long term.

Indexed as

actbehavioral intentionenvironmental sustainable consumptionenvironmental sustainable foodgoal-directedgoal intentionperceived discrepancypositive value

Identifiers

PMID32754095
PMCPMC7381298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.