Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32754078›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Beyond Screen Time: A Synergistic Approach to a More Comprehensive Assessment of Family Media Exposure During Early Childhood.

Rachel Barr, Heather Kirkorian, Jenny Radesky, Sarah Coyne, Deborah Nichols, Olivia Blanchfield, Sylvia Rusnak, Laura Stockdale, Andy Ribner, Joke Durnez and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Measurement of screen time among young children aged 0-6 years: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Rachel BarrDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Heather KirkorianHuman Development and Family Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Jenny RadeskyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Sarah CoyneSchool of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Deborah NicholsDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
Olivia BlanchfieldDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Sylvia RusnakDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Laura StockdaleSchool of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Andy RibnerLearning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Joke DurnezOpenLattice, Inc., Redwood City, CA, United States.
Mollie EpsteinOpenLattice, Inc., Redwood City, CA, United States.
Mikael HeimannDivision of Psychology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Felix-Sebastian KochDivision of Psychology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Annette SundqvistDivision of Psychology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ulrika Birberg-ThornbergDivision of Psychology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Carolin KonradDepartment of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Michaela SlussareffInstitute of Information Studies and Librarianship, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Adriana BusDepartment of Education, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Francesca BellagambaDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Caroline FitzpatrickDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital media availability has surged over the past decade. Because of a lack of comprehensive measurement tools, this rapid growth in access to digital media is accompanied by a scarcity of research examining the family media context and sociocognitive outcomes. There is also little cross-cultural research in families with young children. Modern media are mobile, interactive, and often short in duration, making them difficult to remember when caregivers respond to surveys about media use. The Comprehensive Assessment of Family Media Exposure (CAFE) Consortium has developed a novel tool to measure household media use through a web-based questionnaire, time-use diary, and passive-sensing app installed on family mobile devices. The goal of developing a comprehensive assessment of family media exposure was to take into account the contextual factors of media use and improve upon the limitations of existing self-report measures, while creating a consistent, scalable, and cost-effective tool. The CAFE tool captures the content and context of early media exposure and addresses the limitations of prior media measurement approaches. Preliminary data collected using this measure have been integrated into a shared visualization platform. In this perspective article, we take a tools-of-the-trade approach (Oakes, 2010) to describe four challenges associated with measuring household media exposure in families with young children: measuring attitudes and practices; capturing content and context; measuring short bursts of mobile device usage; and integrating data to capture the complexity of household media usage. We illustrate how each of these challenges can be addressed with preliminary data collected with the CAFE tool and visualized on our dashboard. We conclude with future directions including plans to test reliability, validity, and generalizability of these measures.

Indexed as

digital mediaearly childhoodhousehold usage patternsjoint media engagementpassive sensingtechnoferencetime use activity data

Identifiers

PMID32754078
PMCPMC7365934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.