Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32754062›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020

The Impact of Psychological Resources on Body Mass Index in Obesity Surgery Candidates.

Anita Robitzsch, Adam Schweda, Madeleine Hetkamp, Marco Niedergethmann, Nora Dörrie, Stephan Herpertz, Till Hasenberg, Sefik Tagay, Martin Teufel, Eva-Maria Skoda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anita RobitzschDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany.
Adam SchwedaDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany.
Madeleine HetkampDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany.
Marco NiedergethmannDepartment of Surgery, Alfried-Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Nora DörrieDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stephan HerpertzDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL-University, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Till HasenbergHelios Obestiy Center West, Helios St. Elisabeth Hospital Oberhausen, Witten/Herdecke University, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Sefik TagayFaculty of Applied Social Sciences, Technical University of Köln, Köln, Germany.
Martin TeufelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany.
Eva-Maria SkodaDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEAlfried Krupp Hospital · DERuhr University Bochum · DETH Köln - University of Applied Sciences · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity surgery is the therapy of choice for severely obese patients. The results are promising, but at the same time obesity surgery represents a physical and psychological challenge for patients and care givers. In order to give psychosocial support adequately, more knowledge of effects of psychological profiles is required. Research is often deficit and symptom oriented. Psychological resources (competences) of individuals are often neglected. However, after surgery patients have to cope with the altered anatomic condition and therefore psychological resources are essential for a successful development and my influence also the surgical outcome. The interplay of eating behavior, depression, and psychological resources and their influence on weight are yet undetermined.

methodsA cross-sectional study in consecutive obesity surgery candidates was performed. One hundred twenty-seven participants were included (90 female, 37 male; mean BMI 49.85 kg/m²; range 36.7-84.2 kg/m²). After conducting semi-structured clinical interviews psychological resources, depression and eating behavior were assessed

resultsPsychological resources do not influence BMI directly. Path analyses revealed depression as well as depression/eating behavior as mediating dimension. A first path showed that higher psychological resources are associated with less depressive symptoms and lower BMI. On the other side, a second path showed that higher psychological resources are related to less depression and by means of more conscious and controlled eating behavior to a lower BMI.

conclusionPsychological resources seem to be relevant in the context of obesity surgery. Good psychological resources show plausible associations with less depression and a more adequate eating behavior. The evaluation of psychological resources in obesity surgery candidates allows the identification of patients at risk. Competences of patients should be addressed in the context of surgery. Our findings build a foundation for a more individualized supportive treatment for obesity surgery candidates. Improving impaired psychological resources may help in the coping process after surgery and is supposed to lead to an even higher weight loss.

Indexed as

body mass indexEating Disorder Examination Questionnaireobesity surgeryPatients Health Questionnaire-dpsychological resources

Identifiers

PMID32754062
PMCPMC7365886
OpenAlexW3042089065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.