Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32754054›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2020

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease.

Yannick Molgat-Seon, Michele R Schaeffer, Christopher J Ryerson, Jordan A Guenette

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06141603 (Comparison of Upper and Lower Limb Maximal Exercise Capacities, Muscle Oxygenation and Energy Consumption During Tests in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06141603 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Upper and Lower Limb Maximal Exercise Capacities, Muscle Oxygenation and Energy Consumption During Tests in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsInterstitial Lung Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Identifying limitations to exercise with incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in interstitial lung diseases and the value of ventilatory efficiency.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yannick Molgat-SeonDepartment of Kinesiology and Applied Health, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Michele R SchaefferCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Christopher J RyersonCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jordan A GuenetteCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
St. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a heterogeneous group of conditions characterized by fibrosis and/or inflammation of the lung parenchyma. The pathogenesis of ILD consistently results in exertional dyspnea and exercise intolerance. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides important information concerning the pathophysiology of ILD that can help inform patient management. Despite the purported benefits of CPET, its clinical utility in ILD is not well defined; however, there is a growing body of evidence that provides insight into the potential value of CPET in ILD. Characteristic responses to CPET in patients with ILD include exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia, an exaggerated ventilatory response, a rapid and shallow breathing pattern, critically low inspiratory reserve volume, and elevated sensations of dyspnea and leg discomfort. CPET is used in ILD to determine cause(s) of symptoms such as exertional dyspnea, evaluate functional capacity, inform exercise prescription, and determine the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on exercise capacity and exertional symptoms. However, preliminary evidence suggests that CPET in ILD may also provide valuable prognostic information and can be used to ascertain the degree of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension. Despite these recent advances, additional research is required to confirm the utility of CPET in patients with ILD. This brief review outlines the clinical utility of CPET in patients with ILD. Typical patterns of response are described and practical issues concerning CPET interpretation in ILD are addressed. Additionally, important unanswered questions relating to the clinical utility of CPET in the assessment, prognostication, and management of patients with ILD are identified.

Indexed as

dyspneaexercise capacityhypoxemiaidiopathic pulmonary fibrosisventilatory limitation

Identifiers

PMID32754054
PMCPMC7365876
OpenAlexW3040727556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.