Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32754018›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2020

Dissociating Cognitive Processes During Ambiguous Information Processing in Perceptual Decision-Making.

Vladimir A Maksimenko, Alexander Kuc, Nikita S Frolov, Marina V Khramova, Alexander N Pisarchik, Alexander E Hramov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vladimir A MaksimenkoInstitute of Information Technologies, Mathematics and Mechanics, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Alexander KucCenter for Technologies in Robotics and Mechatronics Component, Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia.
Nikita S FrolovCenter for Technologies in Robotics and Mechatronics Component, Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia.
Marina V KhramovaFaculty of Information Technologies, Saratov State University, Saratov, Russia.
Alexander N PisarchikCenter for Technologies in Robotics and Mechatronics Component, Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia.
Alexander E HramovCenter for Technologies in Robotics and Mechatronics Component, Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making requires the accumulation of sensory evidence. However, in everyday life, sensory information is often ambiguous and contains decision-irrelevant features. This means that the brain must disambiguate sensory input and extract decision-relevant features. Sensory information processing and decision-making represent two subsequent stages of the perceptual decision-making process. While sensory processing relies on occipito-parietal neuronal activity during the earlier time window, decision-making lasts for a prolonged time, involving parietal and frontal areas. Although perceptual decision-making is being actively studied, its neuronal mechanisms under ambiguous sensory evidence lack detailed consideration. Here, we analyzed the brain activity of subjects accomplishing a perceptual decision-making task involving the classification of ambiguous stimuli. We demonstrated that ambiguity induced high frontal θ-band power for 0.15 s post-stimulus onset, indicating increased reliance on top-down processes, such as expectations and memory. Ambiguous processing also caused high occipito-parietal β-band power for 0.2 s and high fronto-parietal β-power for 0.35-0.42 s post-stimulus onset. We supposed that the former component reflected the disambiguation process while the latter reflected the decision-making phase. Our findings complemented existing knowledge about ambiguous perception by providing additional information regarding the temporal discrepancy between the different cognitive processes during perceptual decision-making.

Indexed as

ambiguous stimulidecision-makingdisambiguation processperceptual decision-makingsensory processingtop-down control

Identifiers

PMID32754018
PMCPMC7370842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.