ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2020
Dissociating Cognitive Processes During Ambiguous Information Processing in Perceptual Decision-Making.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frontal Theta Oscillations in Perceptual Decision-Making Reflect Cognitive Control and Confidence.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Bistability and hysteresis in the proximity-based grouping of dot lattices.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Weighted Coherence Analysis as a Window into the Neurophysiological Effects of Traumatic Brain Injury.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Conspiracy beliefs are associated with a reduction in frontal beta power and biases in categorizing ambiguous stimuli.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Studying perceptual bias in favor of the from-above Necker cube perspective in a goal-directed behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Verifying unfamiliar identities: Effects of processing name and face information in the same identity-matching task.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022Article
- Cross-modal auditory priors drive the perception of bistable visual stimuli with reliable differences between individuals.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Sensor-Level Wavelet Analysis Reveals EEG Biomarkers of Perceptual Decision-Making.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Combining Statistical Analysis and Machine Learning for EEG Scalp Topograms Classification.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decision-making requires the accumulation of sensory evidence. However, in everyday life, sensory information is often ambiguous and contains decision-irrelevant features. This means that the brain must disambiguate sensory input and extract decision-relevant features. Sensory information processing and decision-making represent two subsequent stages of the perceptual decision-making process. While sensory processing relies on occipito-parietal neuronal activity during the earlier time window, decision-making lasts for a prolonged time, involving parietal and frontal areas. Although perceptual decision-making is being actively studied, its neuronal mechanisms under ambiguous sensory evidence lack detailed consideration. Here, we analyzed the brain activity of subjects accomplishing a perceptual decision-making task involving the classification of ambiguous stimuli. We demonstrated that ambiguity induced high frontal θ-band power for 0.15 s post-stimulus onset, indicating increased reliance on top-down processes, such as expectations and memory. Ambiguous processing also caused high occipito-parietal β-band power for 0.2 s and high fronto-parietal β-power for 0.35-0.42 s post-stimulus onset. We supposed that the former component reflected the disambiguation process while the latter reflected the decision-making phase. Our findings complemented existing knowledge about ambiguous perception by providing additional information regarding the temporal discrepancy between the different cognitive processes during perceptual decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.