ArticlePatient preference and adherence2020
Real-World Treatment Patterns of Disease Modifying Therapy (DMT) for Patients with Relapse-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis and Patient Satisfaction with Therapy: Results of the Non-Interventional SKARLET Study in Slovakia.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient profiling in relapsing multiple sclerosis: insights from a real-world observational study into the unmet medical needs of patients on disease-modifying therapy.Journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Long-Term Management and Therapeutic Sequencing for Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in France: A Vignette Study.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Clinical Practice Evidence of Treatment Satisfaction with Moderate and High-Efficacy Drugs in Multiple Sclerosis.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Treatment Satisfaction with Teriflunomide in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Review
- TAURUS-MS II: real-world use of teriflunomide in Germany and changes in treatment patterns over time.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2024Article
- Course of therapy in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis despite first-line treatment.Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2023Article
- Disease-Modifying Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: Evaluation of Patients Satisfaction in Iranian Multiple Sclerosis Population.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2023Article
- Patient-based benefit-risk assessment of medicines: development, refinement, and validation of a content search strategy to retrieve relevant studies.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022Article
- Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Treatment Switching and Discontinuation Over 20 Years in the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data Network.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring long-term multiple sclerosis therapy, patient satisfaction with received treatment has considerable impact on treatment outcomes. Here we report the results of a non-interventional real-world study that mapped the treatment patterns of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and assessed treatment satisfaction with DMT. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe SKARLET study was a non-interventional, cross-sectional study in Slovakia running from May 2016 to March 2017. Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis on DMT for ≥3 months and ≤2 years (per local labelling) from 10 multiple sclerosis centers across Slovakia were included. The primary objective was to collect the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version 9 (TSQM 9) score regarding perceived effectiveness, convenience and overall satisfaction with DMT.
resultsThe following TSQM 9 scores (mean; 95% confidence interval) were reported from 415 patients: convenience (75.05; 73.49-76.61), effectiveness (68.15; 66.56-69.75) and global satisfaction scale (66.94; 65.26-68.62). All three parameters of the TSQM 9 were analyzed by the route of DMT administration, with infusions best rated for effectiveness and global satisfaction in comparison to oral dosage and injections. For convenience, however, oral dosage forms were appraised highly (82.66; 80.59-84.73) followed by infusions (74.40; 70.12-78.69), while injections were rated as the worst (66.92; 64.81-69.04). The difference of TSQM 9 scores according to the route of DMT administration is statistically significant for convenience (p < 0.001) and global satisfaction (p = 0.004), but not for effectiveness (p = 0.185).
conclusionIn the present study, it was confirmed that patients find oral DMTs as most convenient; however, the infusion form of treatment outweighs oral DMTs in global satisfaction and effectiveness. The differences of TSQM 9 scores among DMT dosage forms were significant for convenience and global satisfaction. In conclusion, the results of this detailed survey increase our understanding of RRMS patient population characteristics and patient satisfaction with DMT treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.