Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32753837›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Complete and Early Vitrectomy for Endophthalmitis After Cataract Surgery: An Alternative Treatment Paradigm.

Bernard Dib, Robert E Morris, Matthew H Oltmanns, Mathew R Sapp, Jay P Glover, Ferenc Kuhn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Efficacy and safety of intraocular lens removal combined with vitrectomy for acute endophthalmitis in pseudophakic eyes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Areas of uncertainty in endophthalmitis care.World journal of clinical cases · 2026
    Review
  7. Endophthalmitis caused byInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Endogenous endophthalmitis due toClinical case reports · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernard DibRetina Specialists of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8973-9503
Robert E MorrisRetina Specialists of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4762-4817
Matthew H OltmannsRetina Specialists of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7369-8268
Mathew R SappRetina Specialists of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jay P GloverRetina Consultants of Nashville, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ferenc KuhnHelen Keller Foundation for Research and Education, Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital · USKliničko Bolnički Centar Zvezdara · RSRetina Consultants of Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we report the treatment outcomes of complete and early vitrectomy for endophthalmitis (CEVE) after cataract surgery as the predominate initial treatment, accompanied by systemic antibiotics and retreatment of persistent or recurrent purulence (CEVE+). PATIENTS AND

methodsClinical features and microbiological factors were retrospectively reviewed in 62 eyes of 62 patients who were treated for acute postcataract endophthalmitis (APCE) occurring within three weeks of cataract surgery at Retina Specialists of Alabama, between 2007 and 2017.

resultsVisual acuity on presentation included light perception (LP) in 18 eyes (29%) and hand motion (HM) in 23 eyes (37%). Initial treatment was maximum possible vitrectomy in 48 eyes (77%) and tap-and-inject in 14 eyes (23%), with 38 eyes (61%) receiving two or more treatments. Cultures for the first intervention were positive in 49 eyes (79%) and virulent in 18 eyes (29%). At a median follow-up time of five months, final visual acuity was ≥20/40 in 49 eyes (79%), between 20/50 and 5/200 in seven eyes (11%), and <5/200 in six eyes (10%). Virulence was the strongest predictor of poor visual outcome. Retinal detachment occurred in four eyes (6%), likely from necrotic retinal defects in each case.

conclusionComplete and early vitrectomy is a safe and effective initial treatment for APCE. When accompanied by systemic antibiotics and retreatment (CEVE+) of recurrent media opacification, it improves recovery of 20/40 or better visual acuity by approximately 50% compared to a predominantly tap-and-inject treatment paradigm. We recommend CEVE for fundus-obscuring APCE (~75% of all cases) whenever the view is inadequate to rule out macular distress.

Indexed as

APCEendophthalmitisEVSpostcataract endophthalmitisTAPtap and injectVITvitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID32753837
PMCPMC7358185
OpenAlexW3040033646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.