ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2020
Reliability of voluntary cough assessments using respiratory flow waveform.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infection control for COVID-19 in hospital examination room.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Voluntary cough can be assessed by recording flow waves. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability of the measurements of respiratory flow waveforms, using equipment that recorded flow waves during cough. [Participants and Methods] Twenty healthy participants were recruited for this study. They underwent spirometry on them and, subsequently, their flow waves during single and consecutive voluntary cough tasks in the sitting position were recorded. The intra-class correlation coefficient was used to assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities for the voluntary cough data. [Results] The intra-class correlation coefficients were 0.6 to 0.8 for 'intra-rater reliability' and higher than 0.9 for 'inter-rater reliability', for single and consecutive cough tasks. The first assessment of cough peak flow was significantly higher than the second, during consecutive cough tasks. Similarly, the first assessment of cough volume acceleration was significantly higher than the second. [Conclusion] Our results demonstrated high intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities for single and consecutive cough tasks. Following additional procedures and valuations, including the storage of data and standard range decisions, this method of cough assessment will be applied to patients with reduced cough function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.