Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32753595›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Reevaluation of motoneuron morphology: diversity and regularity among motoneurons innervating different arm muscles along a proximal-distal axis.

Satoshi Fukuda, Hitoshi Maeda, Masaki Sakurai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satoshi FukudaDepartment of Physiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Kaga 2-11-1, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan.
Hitoshi MaedaDepartment of Physiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Kaga 2-11-1, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan.
Masaki SakuraiDepartment of Physiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Kaga 2-11-1, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8605, Japan. msakurai@med.teikyo-u.ac.jp.
Teikyo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic fields of spinal motoneurons (MNs) are popularly believed to be stellate; however, variation in dendritic arborization, especially concerning the innervated muscle groups, has not been systematically studied. We addressed this problem by injecting Neurobiotin through patch-pipettes into single MNs (rat cervical cord slices) that had been retrogradely labelled from innervated muscle groups situated along a proximal (here named "scapular" including serratus anterior) to distal (forearm) axis. MNs had fairly straight dendrites with small numbers of mainly proximal branches that exhibited acute branch angles, leaving large areas around the cells with no dendrites. MNs in the same group of pools showed similar morphologies, but there were clear differences among groups. Forearm MNs (n = 35) showed hemidirectionally-extended multipolar dendrites, whereas scapular MNs (n = 15) had bipolar dendrites, and pectoralis MNs (n = 20) had an intermediate morphology. MNs thus showed a spectrum of morphologic characteristics along the axis. This may be because more distally-located forearm muscles are involved in finer movements and need a wider variety of inputs for neural control than proximally-located muscles. We also devised a quantitative method for evaluating the degree to which a cell's dendritic field displays a symmetric spherical shape; only 20% of MNs tested reached this criterion.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CountForelimbMotor NeuronsRats

Identifiers

PMID32753595
PMCPMC7403389
OpenAlexW3047489638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.