ArticleNeurology2020
Association of fast ripples on intracranial EEG and outcomes after epilepsy surgery.
Article in Neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Value of Complete Resection of the High-Frequency Oscillation Area in Intracranial EEG: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Internal and external validation of comprehensive high-frequency activity biomarkers for epilepsy surgery.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- The Influence of Recording Duration and Vigilance State on High-Frequency Oscillation Characterization in Epilepsy.Neurology · 2026Article
- Bridging computational and clinical strategies for presurgical identification of epileptogenic networks.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Review
- Fast ripple-delta coupling as an early biomarker for post-traumatic epileptogenesis in repetitive brain injury.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Internal and External Validation of Comprehensive High-Frequency Activity Biomarkers for Epilepsy Surgery.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Self-supervised data-driven approach defines pathological high-frequency oscillations in epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Layer 6 Corticothalamic Neurons Induce High Gamma Oscillations Through Cortico-cortical and Cortico-thalamo-cortical Pathways.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- No association between histopathology and neurophysiology in surgical specimens from pediatric focal epilepsy patients.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Spikes on ripples are better interictal biomarkers of epilepsy than spikes or ripples.Brain communications · 2025Article
- High-frequency oscillations in epileptic and non-epileptic Alzheimer's disease patients and the differential effect of levetiracetam on the oscillations.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Interictal waking and sleep electrophysiological properties of the thalamus in focal epilepsies.Brain communications · 2025Article
- To plan efficacious epilepsy surgery.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Simulated resections and RNS placement can optimize post-operative seizure outcomes when guided by fast ripple networks.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- A spatial perturbation framework to validate implantation of the epileptogenic zone.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Pathological and Physiological High-frequency Oscillations on Electroencephalography in Patients with Epilepsy.Neuroscience bulletin · 2024Review
- Pathological neurons generate ripples at the UP-DOWN transition disrupting information transfer.Epilepsia · 2024Article
- Simulated resections and responsive neurostimulator placement can optimize postoperative seizure outcomes when guided by fast ripple networks.Brain communications · 2024Article
- High frequency oscillation network dynamics predict outcome in non-palliative epilepsy surgery.Brain communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine whether fast ripples (FRs) are an accurate marker of the epileptogenic zone, we analyzed overnight stereo-EEG recordings from 43 patients and hypothesized that FR resection ratio, maximal FR rate, and FR distribution predict postsurgical seizure outcome.
methodsWe detected FRs automatically from an overnight recording edited for artifacts and visually from a 5-minute period of slow-wave sleep. We examined primarily the accuracy of removing ≥50% of total FR events or of channels with FRs to predict postsurgical seizure outcome (Engel class I = good, classes II-IV = poor) according to the whole-night and 5-minute analysis approaches. Secondarily, we examined the association of low overall FR rates or absence or incomplete resection of 1 dominant FR area with poor outcome.
resultsThe accuracy of outcome prediction was highest (81%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 67%-92%) with the use of the FR event resection ratio and whole-night recording (vs 72%, 95% CI 56%-85%, for the visual 5-minute approach). Absence of channels with FR rates >6/min (
conclusionsFRs are accurate in predicting epilepsy surgery outcome at the individual level when overnight recordings are used. Absence of channels with high FR rates or absence of 1 dominant FR area is a poor prognostic factor that may reflect suboptimal spatial sampling of the epileptogenic zone or multifocality, rather than an inherently low sensitivity of FRs. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that FRs are accurate in predicting epilepsy surgery outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.