Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32753058›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Are there changes in medical specialist contacts after transition to a nursing home? an analysis of German claims data.

Ove Spreckelsen, Guido Schmiemann, Michael H Freitag, Alexander M Fassmer, Bettina Engel, Falk Hoffmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ove SpreckelsenDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of General Practice, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany. ove.spreckelsen@uni-oldenburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5782-2756
Guido SchmiemannDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Michael H FreitagDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of General Practice, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany.
Alexander M FassmerDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Bettina EngelDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of General Practice, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany.
Falk HoffmannDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProvision of ambulatory care by medical specialists for nursing home residents (NHR) is discussed to be inadequate in Germany, however with only incomplete evidence on this topic. We wanted to know whether the transition to a nursing home is associated with a general decrease in medical specialist care and therefore compared contact rates before and after institutionalization.

methodsClaims data of 18,779 newly admitted NHR in 2013 were followed for the whole year prior to and up to two years after admission. The frequencies of contacts to specialists were assessed and stratified by sex, age, care level, dementia diagnosis and chronic conditions. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify predictors for contacts to specialists.

resultsOne year after institutionalization the most pronounced decrease was found in contacts with ophthalmologists (38.4% vs. 30.6%) whereas with most other specialties only small changes were found. The only specialty with a large increase were neurologists and psychiatrists (27.2% vs. 43.0%). Differences depending on sex and age were rather small while NHR with dementia or a higher care level had lower contact rates after institutionalization. Before institutionalization most patients were referred to a specialist by a general practitioner (61.7-73.9%) while thereafter this proportion decreased substantially (27.8-58.6%). The strongest predictor for a specialist contact after admission to a nursing home was a contact to a specialist before (OR 8.8, CI 7.96-9.72 for contacts to neurologists or psychiatrists). A higher nursing care level and a higher age were also predictors for specialist contacts.

conclusionsRelevant decreases of ambulatory specialist care utilization after institutionalization are restricted to ophthalmologists. NHR of higher age and higher nursing care level had a lower chance for a specialist contact. The assessment of the adequacy of the provided care after institutionalization remains inconclusive due to little investigated but assumable changes in care needs of NHR. The decreased coordination of care by general practitioners after institutionalization conflicts with health policy goals.

Indexed as

Transitional CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleNursing HomesSpecializationGermanyHealth services researchNursing home residentsPrimary careSecondary data analysisSpecialist care

Identifiers

PMID32753058
PMCPMC7405335
OpenAlexW3047110938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.