Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32752256›Full record

ReviewInsects2020

Plant-Derived Natural Compounds for Tick Pest Control in Livestock and Wildlife: Pragmatism or Utopia?

Danilo G Quadros, Tammi L Johnson, Travis R Whitney, Jonathan D Oliver, Adela S Oliva Chávez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Essential Oils againstMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danilo G QuadrosTexas A&M AgriLife Research, San Angelo, TX 76901, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9061-9071
Tammi L JohnsonDepartment of Rangelands, Wildlife and Fisheries Management, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, Uvalde, TX 78801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0752-0012
Travis R WhitneyTexas A&M AgriLife Research, San Angelo, TX 76901, USA.
Jonathan D OliverEnvironmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8738-112X
Adela S Oliva ChávezDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2397-0846
Texas A&M University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

U.S. Department of Agriculture Hatch-MultiState Project #TEX0-1-7714U.S. Department of Agriculture Hatch Project #1019784U.S. Department of Agriculture Hatch Project #205866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks and tick-borne diseases are a significant economic hindrance for livestock production and a menace to public health. The expansion of tick populations into new areas, the occurrence of acaricide resistance to synthetic chemical treatments, the potentially toxic contamination of food supplies, and the difficulty of applying chemical control in wild-animal populations have created greater interest in developing new tick control alternatives. Plant compounds represent a promising avenue for the discovery of such alternatives. Several plant extracts and secondary metabolites have repellent and acaricidal effects. However, very little is known about their mode of action, and their commercialization is faced with multiple hurdles, from the determination of an adequate formulation to field validation and public availability. Further, the applicability of these compounds to control ticks in wild-animal populations is restrained by inadequate delivery systems that cannot guarantee accurate dosage delivery at the right time to the target animal populations. More work, financial support, and collaboration with regulatory authorities, research groups, and private companies are needed to overcome these obstacles. Here, we review the advancements on known plant-derived natural compounds with acaricidal potential and discuss the road ahead toward the implementation of organic control in managing ticks and tick-borne diseases.

Indexed as

integrated pest management (IPM)natural acaricidenatural repellentplant extracttick-borne diseasestick control

Identifiers

PMID32752256
PMCPMC7469192
OpenAlexW3046406476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.