ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2020
Effect of Novel Antibacterial Composites on Bacterial Biofilms.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifaceted characterization of antibacterial resin composites: A scoping review on efficacy, properties, and in vivo performance.The Japanese dental science review · 2025Review
- TheBiomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025Article
- Navigating Antibacterial Frontiers: A Panoramic Exploration of Antibacterial Landscapes, Resistance Mechanisms, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.ACS infectious diseases · 2024Review
- Effects of Novel Dental Composites onJournal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- The effect of varying monocalcium phosphate and polylysine levels on dental composite properties.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2023Article
- Development of the oral resistome during the first decade of life.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Polycaprolactone Electrospun Nanofiber Membrane with Sustained Chlorohexidine Release Capability against Oral Pathogens.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Development and Physicochemical Characterization ofJournal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Preparation of Silica Aerogel/Resin Composites and Their Application in Dental Restorative Materials.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Properties of Three Resin-Based Dental Composites againstMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Bacterial Interactions with Dental and Medical Materials.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2020Article
- Early Polylysine Release from Dental Composites and Its Effects on PlanktonicJournal of functional biomaterials · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Continuing cariogenic bacterial growth demineralizing dentine beneath a composite filling is the most common cause of tooth restoration failure. Novel composites with antibacterial polylysine (PLS) (0, 4, 6, or 8 wt%) in its filler phase were therefore produced. Remineralising monocalcium phosphate was also included at double the PLS weight. Antibacterial studies involved set composite disc placement in 1% sucrose-supplemented broth containing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.