ArticleCells2020
CpG-Islands as Markers for Liquid Biopsies of Cancer Patients.
Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revolutionizing lung cancer screening: the rise of artificial intelligence integrating circulating tumor markers.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Bridging Discovery and Treatment: Cancer Biomarker.Cancers · 2025Review
- DNA methylation patterns and predictive models for metabolic disease risk in offspring of gestational diabetes mellitus.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Cancer liquid biopsies by Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing of cell-free DNA: from basic research to clinical applications.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Use of Multiple Machine Learning Approaches for Selecting Urothelial Cancer-Specific DNA Methylation Biomarkers in Urine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Advances in blood DNA methylation-based assay for colorectal cancer early detection: a systematic updated review.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2024Review
- Cell-free DNA methylome profiling by MBD-seq with ultra-low input.Epigenetics · 2022Article
- Cancer Detection and Classification by CpG Island Hypermethylation Signatures in Plasma Cell-Free DNA.Cancers · 2021Article
- Machine Learning Protocols in Early Cancer Detection Based on Liquid Biopsy: A Survey.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Impact of Preanalytical and Analytical Methods on Cell-Free DNA Diagnostics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Could Extracellular Vesicles Contribute to Generation or Awakening of "Sleepy" Metastatic Niches?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- DNA-Loaded Extracellular Vesicles in Liquid Biopsy: Tiny Players With Big Potential?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of tumours using biomarkers in blood is transforming cancer diagnosis and therapy. Cancers are characterised by evolving genetic alterations, making it difficult to develop reliable and broadly applicable DNA-based biomarkers for liquid biopsy. In contrast to the variability in gene mutations, the methylation pattern remains generally constant during carcinogenesis. Thus, methylation more than mutation analysis may be exploited to recognise tumour features in the blood of patients. In this work, we investigated the possibility of using global CpG (CpG means a CG motif in the context of methylation. The p represents the phosphate. This is used to distinguish CG sites meant for methylation from other CG motifs or from mentions of CG content) island methylation profiles as a basis for the prediction of cancer state of patients utilising liquid biopsy samples. We retrieved existing GEO methylation datasets on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from HCC patients and healthy donors, as well as healthy whole blood and purified peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples, and used a random forest classifier as a predictor. Additionally, we tested three different feature selection techniques in combination. When using cfDNA samples together with solid tumour samples and healthy blood samples of different origin, we could achieve an average accuracy of 0.98 in a 10-fold cross-validation. In this setting, all the feature selection methods we tested in this work showed promising results. We could also show that it is possible to use solid tumour samples and purified PBMCs as a training set and correctly predict a cfDNA sample as cancerous or healthy. In contrast to the complete set of samples, the feature selections led to varying results of the respective random forests. ANOVA feature selection worked well with this training set, and the selected features allowed the random forest to predict all cfDNA samples correctly. Feature selection based on mutual information could also lead to better than random results, but LASSO feature selection would not lead to a confident prediction. Our results show the relevance of CpG islands as tumour markers in blood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.