Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32752135›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Senescence and Cancer: A Review of Clinical Implications of Senescence and Senotherapies.

Lynda Wyld, Ilaria Bellantuono, Tamara Tchkonia, Jenna Morgan, Olivia Turner, Fiona Foss, Jayan George, Sarah Danson, James L Kirkland

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 222 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. BCLXSignal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Cellular Senescence Triggered by Food and Environmental Genotoxins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lynda WyldThe Healthy Lifespan Institute, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4046-5940
Ilaria BellantuonoThe Healthy Lifespan Institute, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9994-6987
Tamara TchkoniaRobert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Jenna MorganThe Healthy Lifespan Institute, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.
Olivia TurnerThe Healthy Lifespan Institute, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.
Fiona FossDepartment of Pathology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.
Jayan GeorgeThe Healthy Lifespan Institute, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8899-6620
Sarah DansonThe Healthy Lifespan Institute, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.
James L KirklandDepartments of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
University of Sheffield · GBMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Targeting Cellular Senescence to Extend HealthspanP01AG062413 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sundeep Khosla, Nathan K LeBrasseur · 2019 to 2026
$28.7M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG062413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence is a key component of human aging that can be induced by a range of stimuli, including DNA damage, cellular stress, telomere shortening, and the activation of oncogenes. Senescence is generally regarded as a tumour suppressive process, both by preventing cancer cell proliferation and suppressing malignant progression from pre-malignant to malignant disease. It may also be a key effector mechanism of many types of anticancer therapies, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapies, both directly and via bioactive molecules released by senescent cells that may stimulate an immune response. However, senescence may contribute to reduced patient resilience to cancer therapies and may provide a pathway for disease recurrence after cancer therapy. A new group of drugs, senotherapies, (drugs which interact with senescent cells to interfere with their pro-aging impacts by either selectively destroying senescent cells (senolytic drugs) or inhibiting their function (senostatic drugs)) are under active investigation to determine whether they can enhance the efficacy of cancer therapies and improve resilience to cancer treatments. Senolytic drugs include quercetin, navitoclax, and fisetin and preclinical and early phase clinical data are emerging of their potential role in cancer treatments, although none are yet in routine use clinically. This article provides a review of these issues.

Indexed as

agingcancerfrailtygeriatric oncologysenescencesenolyticssenotherapies

Identifiers

PMID32752135
PMCPMC7464619
OpenAlexW3046779484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.