Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32752031›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Genetic Transformation in Peach (

Angela Ricci, Silvia Sabbadini, Humberto Prieto, Isabel Mg Padilla, Chris Dardick, Zhijian Li, Ralph Scorza, Cecilia Limera, Bruno Mezzetti, Margarita Perez-Jimenez and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CRISPR/Cas as a Genome-Editing Technique in Fruit Tree Breeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. The Highly EmbryogenicPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Angela RicciDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Silvia SabbadiniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2740-5708
Humberto PrietoLaboratorio de Biotecnología, La Platina Research Station, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Santa Rosa, La Pintana, Santiago 11610, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-9013-1906
Isabel Mg PadillaÁrea de Genómica y Biotecnología, Grupo de Morfogénesis y Modificación Genética, IFAPA-Centro de Churriana, Cortijo de la Cruz s/n, 29140 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3497-2313
Chris DardickUSDA-ARS-Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA.
Zhijian LiUSDA-ARS-Appalachian Fruit Research Station, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA.
Ralph ScorzaRalph Scorza LLC, Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Consulting Services, P.O. Box 1191, Shepherdstown, WV 25443, USA.
Cecilia LimeraDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Bruno MezzettiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9307-812X
Margarita Perez-JimenezMejora Genética de Cítricos, Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (IMIDA), C/ Mayor s/n, 30150 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1005-3280
Lorenzo BurgosDepartamento de Mejora Vegetal, Grupo de Biotecnología de Frutales, CEBAS-CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, 30100 Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2399-8232
Cesar PetriDepartamento de Fruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea, IHSM-UMA-CSIC, Avenida Dr. Wienberg, s/n. 29750 Algarrobo-Costa, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0773-929X
Marche Polytechnic University · ITAppalachian Fruit Research Laboratory · USAndalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training · ESCentro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura · ESInstituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea "La Mayora" · ESInstituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias · CLInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost 30 years have passed since the first publication reporting regeneration of transformed peach plants. Nevertheless, the general applicability of genetic transformation of this species has not yet been established. Many strategies have been tested in order to obtain an efficient peach transformation system. Despite the amount of time and the efforts invested, the lack of success has significantly limited the utility of peach as a model genetic system for trees, despite its relatively short generation time; small, high-quality genome; and well-studied genetic resources. Additionally, the absence of efficient genetic transformation protocols precludes the application of many biotechnological tools in peach breeding programs. In this review, we provide an overview of research on regeneration and genetic transformation in this species and summarize novel strategies and procedures aimed at producing transgenic peaches. Promising future approaches to develop a robust peach transformation system are discussed, focusing on the main bottlenecks to success including the low efficiency of

Indexed as

biotechnologyorganogenesisplant breedingRosaceaesomatic embryogenesisstone fruits

Identifiers

PMID32752031
PMCPMC7465125
OpenAlexW3046869504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.