Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32752001›Full record

ArticleViruses2020

Genetic Features of HIV-1 Integrase Sub-Subtype A6 Predominant in Russia and Predicted Susceptibility to INSTIs.

Alina Kirichenko, Ilya Lapovok, Pavel Baryshev, David A M C van de Vijver, Jeroen J A van Kampen, Charles A B Boucher, Dimitrios Paraskevis, Dmitry Kireev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of Integrase Sequences from HIV-1 Subtypes A6/A1 on theAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alina KirichenkoCentral Research Institute of Epidemiology, 111123 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7116-0138
Ilya LapovokCentral Research Institute of Epidemiology, 111123 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6328-1415
Pavel BaryshevCentral Research Institute of Epidemiology, 111123 Moscow, Russia.
David A M C van de VijverViroscience Department, Erasmus Medical Centre, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen J A van KampenViroscience Department, Erasmus Medical Centre, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles A B BoucherViroscience Department, Erasmus Medical Centre, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dimitrios ParaskevisDepartment of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Goudi, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6167-7152
Dmitry KireevCentral Research Institute of Epidemiology, 111123 Moscow, Russia.
Central Research Institute of Epidemiology · RUErasmus University Rotterdam · NLNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) class for the treatment of HIV-infection has pointed to the importance of analyzing the features of HIV-1 subtypes for an improved understanding of viral genetic variability in the occurrence of drug resistance (DR). In this study, we have described the prevalence of INSTI DR in a Russian cohort and the genetic features of HIV-1 integrase sub-subtype A6. We included 408 HIV infected patients who were not exposed to INSTI. Drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were detected among 1.3% of ART-naïve patients and among 2.7% of INSTI-naïve patients. The prevalence of 12 polymorphic mutations was significantly different between sub-subtypes A6 and A1. Analysis of the genetic barriers determined two positions in which subtype A (A1 and A6) showed a higher genetic barrier (G140C and V151I) compared with subtype B, and one position in which subtypes A1 and B displayed a higher genetic barrier (L74M and L74I) than sub-subtype A6. Additionally, we confirmed that the L74I mutation was selected at the early stage of the epidemic and subsequently spread as a founder effect in Russia. Our data have added to the overall understanding of the genetic features of sub-subtype A6 in the context of drug resistance.

Indexed as

AdultDrug Resistance, ViralFemaleGenotypeHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV IntegraseHIV Integrase InhibitorsHumansMaleMutationPhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticPrevalenceRussiaSequence Analysis, DNAHIV IntegraseHIV Integrase InhibitorsA6founder effectgenetic barrierHIV-1INSTIintegraseL74IphylogeneticspolymorphismsRussia

Identifiers

PMID32752001
PMCPMC7472261
OpenAlexW3046561496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.