Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32751715›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Main Challenges and Actions Needed to Improve Conservation and Sustainable Use of Our Crop Wild Relatives.

Johannes M M Engels, Imke Thormann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic analysis of yield components in buckwheat using high-throughput sequencing analysis and wild resource populations.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Conservation and Global Distribution of Onion (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Phylogeography and conservation gaps ofGenetic resources and crop evolution · 2022
    Article
  12. Drying banana seeds forConservation physiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Plant Biodiversity and Genetic Resources Matter!Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johannes M M EngelsAlliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, 00054 Maccarese, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6256-6518
Imke ThormannFederal Office for Agriculture and Food, 53179 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2703-9805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop wild relatives (CWR, plural CWRs) are those wild species that are regarded as the ancestors of our cultivated crops. It was only at the end of the last century that they were accorded a high priority for their conservation and, thus, for many genebanks, they are a new and somewhat unknown set of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. After defining and characterizing CWR and their general threat status, providing an assessment of biological peculiarities of CWR with respect to conservation management, illustrating the need for prioritization and addressing the importance of data and information, we made a detailed assessment of specific aspects of CWRs of direct relevance for their conservation and use. This assessment was complemented by an overview of the current status of CWRs conservation and use, including facts and figures on the in situ conservation, on the ex situ conservation in genebanks and botanic gardens, as well as of the advantages of a combination of in situ and ex situ conservation, the so-called complementary conservation approach. In addition, a brief assessment of the situation with respect to the use of CWRs was made. From these assessments we derived the needs for action in order to achieve a more effective and efficient conservation and use, specifically with respect to the documentation of CWRs, their in situ and ex situ, as well as their complementarity conservation, and how synergies between these components can be obtained. The review was concluded with suggestions on how use can be strengthened, as well as the conservation system at large at the local, national, and regional/international level. Finally, based on the foregoing assessments, a number of recommendations were elaborated on how CWRs can be better conserved and used in order to exploit their potential benefits more effectively.

Indexed as

biological featuresbreedingconservationcrop wild relativescross-sectoral collaborationgene donorsgenetic diversitylocalnational and global effortspolicy(pre-)breedinguse

Identifiers

PMID32751715
PMCPMC7463933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.