Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32751657›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Carcass Characteristics, Physicochemical Properties, and Texture and Microstructure of the Meat and Internal Organs of Carrier and King Pigeons.

Dariusz Kokoszyński, Kamil Stęczny, Joanna Żochowska-Kujawska, Małgorzata Sobczak, Marek Kotowicz, Mohamed Saleh, Martin Fik, Henrieta Arpášová, Cyril Hrnčár, Karol Włodarczyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Evaluation of Meat Quality of Local Pigeon Varieties in China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dariusz KokoszyńskiDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, UTP University of Science and Technology, 85084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6642-1129
Kamil StęcznyDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, UTP University of Science and Technology, 85084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Joanna Żochowska-KujawskaDepartment of Meat Science, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 71550 Szczecin, Poland.
Małgorzata SobczakDepartment of Meat Science, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 71550 Szczecin, Poland.
Marek KotowiczDepartment of Meat Science, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 71550 Szczecin, Poland.
Mohamed SalehDepartment of Poultry and Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University, 82524 Sohag, Egypt.
Martin FikDepartment of Small Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia.
Henrieta ArpášováDepartment of Small Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia.
Cyril HrnčárDepartment of Small Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia.
Karol WłodarczykDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, UTP University of Science and Technology, 85084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology · PLSlovak University of Agriculture in Nitra · SKWest Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin · PLSohag University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pigeons have been the subject of research in the past, but the knowledge gained is incomplete and must be extended. The aim of the study was to provide information about differences in carcass weight and measurements, carcass composition, proximate chemical composition, acidity, electrical conductivity, color attributes, the texture, rheological properties and microstructure of the meat, and some biometric characteristics of the digestive system in carrier and King pigeons, and also to determine if the two compared breeds meet the expectations of pigeon meat consumers to the same extent. The study involved 40 carcasses from carrier pigeons and King pigeons after three reproductive seasons. The chemical composition was determined by near-infrared transmission (NIT) spectroscopy, color coordinates according to CIELab, the texture according to Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) and Warner-Bratzler (WB) tests, and the rheological properties of meat according to the relaxation test. The compared pigeon groups differed significantly (

Indexed as

carcass compositioncarcass measurementsdigestive systemelectrical conductivitymeat colormicrostructurepigeonstexture

Identifiers

PMID32751657
PMCPMC7459732
OpenAlexW3045553584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.