Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32751605›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Between Migrant Care Work and New Occupational Welfare Tools: Changing Home Care Arrangements in Italy.

Georgia Casanova, Mirko Di Rosa, Oliver Fisher, Giovanni Lamura

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georgia CasanovaCenter for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS-INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, 60121 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3944-873X
Mirko Di RosaUnit of Geriatric Pharmacoepidemiology and Biostatistics, IRCCS-INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, 60121 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1862-4159
Oliver FisherCenter for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS-INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, 60121 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2787-2899
Giovanni LamuraCenter for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS-INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Ageing, 60121 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9278-9544
Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani · ITMarche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Austerity measures on services provision, introduced due to recent economic crises, have stimulated the search for innovative welfare solutions, including options that are not directly or entirely funded by public sources. In Italy, recent legislation has promoted the development of occupational welfare (OW) measures, aimed at strengthening the supply of services to support employees with informal (elder) care responsibilities. This paper aims to describe how the newly introduced OW schemes might innovate existing care arrangements, by identifying their impact on the different actors involved in home care provision (care recipients, family carers, home care service providers and migrant care workers), as well as at a macro level in terms of promoting social innovation. The international relevance of the Italian case comes from the fact that it is one of the more representative familistic care regimes, largely characterized by home care provided by informal carers and migrant care workers (MCW). The importance of Italian OW schemes is increasing, and in 2018 their presence in company-level bargaining agreements grew by more than 15%. A rapid review of the literature and expert interviews allowed us to describe the complex Italian OW schemes system, and to identify the positive implications of their application for the country's long-term care (LTC) context, underlining what makes these measures a clear example of "social innovation" likely to have a future positive impact on home-based care in Italy.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesSocial WelfareTransients and MigrantsAdolescentAdultAgedCaregiversFemaleHumansItalyLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adulthome careItalymigrant care workoccupational welfare schemessocial innovation

Identifiers

PMID32751605
PMCPMC7432092
OpenAlexW3046023813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.