Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32751523›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Core Outcome Measurement Instruments for Clinical Trials of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Vivien Reynaud, Anargyros Verdilos, Bruno Pereira, Stéphane Boisgard, Frédéric Costes, Emmanuel Coudeyre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. High variation among clinical studies in the assessment of physical function after knee replacement: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Image-based robotic (ROSAJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Lower Extremity Research.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vivien ReynaudPlateforme d'Exploration de la Mobilité, INRAE, UNH, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Anargyros VerdilosPlateforme d'Exploration de la Mobilité, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bruno PereiraUnité de Biostatistique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Direction Recherche Clinique et Innovation, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3778-7161
Stéphane BoisgardService d'Orthopédie Traumatologie, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, ICCF, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Frédéric CostesPlateforme d'Exploration de la Mobilité, INRAE, UNH, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Emmanuel CoudeyreService de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, INRAE, UNH, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5753-2890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: We have updated knowledge of the psychometric qualities of patient-reported outcome measures and, for the first time, systematically reviewed and compared the psychometric qualities of physical tests for patients with knee osteoarthritis who are undergoing total knee arthroplasty. This work was conducted to facilitate the choice of the most appropriate instruments to use in studies and clinical practice. (2) Methods: A search of medical databases up to December 2019 identified the studies and thus the instruments used. The quality of the measurement properties was assessed by the Bot et al. criteria. (3) Results: We identified 20 studies involving 25 instruments. Half of the instruments were questionnaires (

Indexed as

clinical outcomesfunctional outcomespatient-reported outcome measuresprimary total knee arthroplastysystematic reviewtotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32751523
PMCPMC7463550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.