Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32751451›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Allied Health Optimisation Clinic for Cancer Patients with Complex Needs.

Hannah Ray, Anna Beaumont, Jenelle Loeliger, Alicia Martin, Celia Marston, Karla Gough, Shilpa Bordia, Maria Ftanou, Nicole Kiss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Triage tools to inform the prioritisation of physical health services following a diagnosis of cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Implementation and evaluation of a nurse-allied health clinic for patients after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah RayDepartment of Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Anna BeaumontDepartment of Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Jenelle LoeligerDepartment of Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Alicia MartinDepartment of Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Celia MarstonDepartment of Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Karla GoughCancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2819-4217
Shilpa BordiaCancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Maria FtanouPsychosocial Oncology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria 3000, Australia.
Nicole KissDepartment of Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6476-9834
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUDeakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the feasibility of implementing a multidisciplinary allied health model of care (MOC) for cancer patients with complex needs. The MOC in this retrospective study provided up to eight weeks of nutritional counselling, exercise prescription, fatigue management and psychological support. Implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, fidelity and appropriateness) were evaluated using nine patient interviews, and operational data and medical records of 185 patients referred between August 2017 and December 2018. Adoption, including intention to try and uptake, were acceptable: 88% of referred patients agreed to screening and 71% of eligible patients agreed to clinic participation. Fidelity was mixed, secondary to inpatient admissions and disease progression interrupting patient participation. Clinician compliance with outcome assessment was variable at program commencement (dietetic, 95%; physiotherapy, 91%; occupational therapy, 33%; quality of life, 23%) and low at program completion (dietetic, 32%; physiotherapy, 13%; occupational therapy, 10%; quality of life, 11%) mainly due to non-attendance. Patient interviews revealed high satisfaction and perceived appropriateness. Adoption of the optimisation clinic was acceptable. Interview responses suggest patients feel the clinic is both acceptable and appropriate. This indicates a multidisciplinary model is an important aspect of comprehensive, timely and effective care. However, fidelity was low, secondary to the complexities of the patient cohort.

Indexed as

allied healthcancer patientscomplex needsimplementationmodel of caremultidisciplinaryrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32751451
PMCPMC7465605
OpenAlexW3045507545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.