Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32751210›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

3D-Printed Drug Delivery Systems: The Effects of Drug Incorporation Methods on Their Release and Antibacterial Efficiency.

Bahaa Shaqour, Inés Reigada, Żaneta Górecka, Emilia Choińska, Bart Verleije, Koen Beyers, Wojciech Święszkowski, Adyary Fallarero, Paul Cos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structured engineering of self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS)International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bahaa ShaqourVoxdale bv, Bijkhoevelaan 32C, 2110 Wijnegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1870-5132
Inés ReigadaDrug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Żaneta GóreckaFaculty of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Woloska 141, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4782-6128
Emilia ChoińskaFaculty of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Woloska 141, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3194-3776
Bart VerleijeVoxdale bv, Bijkhoevelaan 32C, 2110 Wijnegem, Belgium.
Koen BeyersVoxdale bv, Bijkhoevelaan 32C, 2110 Wijnegem, Belgium.
Wojciech ŚwięszkowskiFaculty of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Woloska 141, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Adyary FallareroDrug Research Program, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Paul CosLaboratory for Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene (LMPH), Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1 S.7, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4361-8911

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 722467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing technologies have been widely used in the medical field. More specifically, fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D-printing technology has been thoroughly investigated to produce drug delivery systems. Recently, few researchers have explored the possibility of directly 3D printing such systems without the need for producing a filament which is usually the feedstock material for the printer. This was possible via direct feeding of a mixture consisting of the carrier polymer and the required drug. However, as this direct feeding approach shows limited homogenizing abilities, it is vital to investigate the effect of the pre-mixing step on the quality of the 3D printed products. Our study investigates the two commonly used mixing approaches-solvent casting and powder mixing. For this purpose, polycaprolactone (PCL) was used as the main polymer under investigation and gentamicin sulfate (GS) was selected as a reference. The produced systems' efficacy was investigated for bacterial and biofilm prevention. Our data show that the solvent casting approach offers improved drug distribution within the polymeric matrix, as was observed from micro-computed topography and scanning electron microscopy visualization. Moreover, this approach shows a higher drug release rate and thus improved antibacterial efficacy. However, there were no differences among the tested approaches in terms of thermal and mechanical properties.

Indexed as

3D printingdrug loadingdrug releasefused filament fabrication

Identifiers

PMID32751210
PMCPMC7435804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.