Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32750904›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2021

"Automatic Ingestion Monitor Version 2" - A Novel Wearable Device for Automatic Food Intake Detection and Passive Capture of Food Images.

Abul Doulah, Tonmoy Ghosh, Delwar Hossain, Masudul H Imtiaz, Edward Sazonov

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Objective Assessment of Media Screens Effect on Physical Activity in Preschool Children.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Detecting Eating Episodes From Wrist Motion Using Daily Pattern Analysis.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Abul Doulah
Tonmoy Ghosh
Delwar Hossain
Masudul H Imtiaz
Edward Sazonov
University of Alabama · US

Funding

Sensor-based Just-in Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) Targeting Eating BehaviorR01DK122473 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI SAZONOV, EDWARD S, THOMAS, JOHN GRAHAM · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
Assessing Food Intake with the Automatic Ingestion MonitorR01DK100796 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI MCCRORY, MEGAN A, SAZONOV, EDWARD S · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100796NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK122473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of food image capture and/or wearable sensors for dietary assessment has grown in popularity. "Active" methods rely on the user to take an image of each eating episode. "Passive" methods use wearable cameras that continuously capture images. Most of "passively" captured images are not related to food consumption and may present privacy concerns. In this paper, we propose a novel wearable sensor (Automatic Ingestion Monitor, AIM-2) designed to capture images only during automatically detected eating episodes. The capture method was validated on a dataset collected from 30 volunteers in the community wearing the AIM-2 for 24h in pseudo-free-living and 24h in a free-living environment. The AIM-2 was able to detect food intake over 10-second epochs with a (mean and standard deviation) F1-score of 81.8 ± 10.1%. The accuracy of eating episode detection was 82.7%. Out of a total of 180,570 images captured, 8,929 (4.9%) images belonged to detected eating episodes. Privacy concerns were assessed by a questionnaire on a scale 1-7. Continuous capture had concern value of 5.0 ± 1.6 (concerned) while image capture only during food intake had concern value of 1.9 ±1.7 (not concerned). Results suggest that AIM-2 can provide accurate detection of food intake, reduce the number of images for analysis and alleviate the privacy concerns of the users.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesData CollectionEatingFoodHumansMonitoring, Physiologic

Identifiers

PMID32750904
PMCPMC7938421
OpenAlexW3026315368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.