Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32750703›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2021

Proton therapy reduces the likelihood of high-grade radiation-induced lymphopenia in glioblastoma patients: phase II randomized study of protons vs photons.

Radhe Mohan, Amy Y Liu, Paul D Brown, Anita Mahajan, Jeffrey Dinh, Caroline Chung, Sarah McAvoy, Mary Frances McAleer, Steven H Lin, Jing Li and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Radhe MohanDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Amy Y LiuDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota.
Anita MahajanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jeffrey DinhMillennium Physicians Radiation Oncology, The Woodlands, Texas.
Caroline ChungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sarah McAvoyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mary Frances McAleerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Steven H LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Amol J GhiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Cong ZhuDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Erik P SulmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
John F de GrootDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Amy B HeimbergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Susan L McGovernDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Clemens GrassbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Helen ShihDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Susannah EllsworthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
David R GrosshansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMayo Clinic · USIndiana University School of MedicineMillennium Engineering and Integration (United States) · USNew York University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
MDACC Clinical and Research Physics SupportU19CA021239 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HONG, THEODORE S · 2014 to 2018
$11.2M
Mitigating High Grade Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia through Pretreatment Autologous Lymphocyte InfusionR21CA240881 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AL-ATRASH, GHEATH, LIN, STEVEN HSESHENG · 2019 to 2021
$388k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R21 CA240881NCI NIH HHS U19 CA021239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated differences in radiation-induced grade 3+ lymphopenia (G3+L), defined as an absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir of <500 cells/µL, after proton therapy (PT) or X-ray (photon) therapy (XRT) for patients with glioblastoma (GBM).

methodsPatients enrolled in a randomized phase II trial received PT (n = 28) or XRT (n = 56) concomitantly with temozolomide. ALC was measured before, weekly during, and within 1 month after radiotherapy. Whole-brain mean dose (WBMD) and brain dose-volume indices were extracted from planned dose distributions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictive variables. The resulting model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

resultsRates of G3+L were lower in men (7/47 [15%]) versus women (19/37 [51%]) (P < 0.001), and for PT (4/28 [14%]) versus XRT (22/56 [39%]) (P = 0.024). G3+L was significantly associated with baseline ALC, WBMD, and brain volumes receiving 5‒40 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) or higher (ie, V5 through V40). Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis identified being female (odds ratio [OR] 6.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95‒22.4, P = 0.003), baseline ALC (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.05‒0.51, P = 0.003), and whole-brain V20 (OR 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03‒1.13, P = 0.002) as the strongest predictors. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.94) for the final G3+L prediction model.

conclusionsSex, baseline ALC, and whole-brain V20 were the strongest predictors of G3+L for patients with GBM treated with radiation and temozolomide. PT reduced brain volumes receiving low and intermediate doses and, consequently, reduced G3+L.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaLymphopeniaProton TherapyFemaleHumansMalePhotonsProtonsRadiotherapy DosageProtonsGBMglioblastomalymphopeniaproton therapy

Identifiers

PMID32750703
PMCPMC7906048
OpenAlexW3047582945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.