Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32750492›Full record

ArticleRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2020

Pharmacological disinhibition enhances paced breathing following complete spinal cord injury in rats.

T Bezdudnaya, M A Lane, V Marchenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Spinal Interneurons as Gatekeepers to Neuroplasticity after Injury or Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T BezdudnayaDrexel University College of Medicine, Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, 2900 W Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA, 19129, United States.
M A LaneDrexel University College of Medicine, Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, 2900 W Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA, 19129, United States.
V MarchenkoDrexel University College of Medicine, Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, 2900 W Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA, 19129, United States; Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Anesthesiology, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Wauwatosa, WI, 53226, United States. Electronic address: vmarchenko@mcw.edu.

Funding

SurgeryP01NS055976 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI TOM, VERONICA JEAN · 2007 to 2017
$12.3M
Neural transplants to promote respiratory plasticity after spinal cord injuryR01NS104291 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI LANE, MICHAEL ARON · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Optimizing functional recovery following cervical spinal cord injuryR01NS081112 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LANE, MICHAEL ARON · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS055976NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081112NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory dysfunction is one of the most devastating and life-threatening deficits that occurs following cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Assisted breathing with mechanical ventilators is a necessary part of care for many cervical injured individuals, but it is also associated with increased risk of secondary complications such as infection, muscle atrophy and maladaptive plasticity. Pre-clinical studies with epidural stimulation (EDS) have identified it as an alternative/additional method to support adequate lung ventilation without mechanical assistance. The full potential of EDS, however, may be limited by spinal inhibitory mechanisms within the injured spinal cord. The goal of the present work is to assess the potential improvement for EDS in combination with pharmacological disinhibition of spinal circuits following complete high cervical SCI. All experiments were performed in decerebrate, unanesthetized, non-paralyzed (n = 13) and paralyzed (n = 8) adult Sprague-Dawley rats 6 h following a complete C1 transection. The combination of high-frequency EDS (HF-EDS) at the C4 spinal segment with intrathecal delivery of GABA and glycine receptors antagonists (GABAzine and strychnine, respectively) resulted in significantly increased phrenic motor output, tidal volume and amplitude of diaphragm electrical activity compared to HF-EDS alone. Thus, it appears that spinal fast inhibitory mechanisms limit phrenic motor output and present a new neuropharmacological target to improve paced breathing in individuals with cervical SCI.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord StimulationAnimalsCervical CordCombined Modality TherapyDiaphragmDisease Models, AnimalEpidural SpaceGABA AntagonistsGlycine AgentsInjections, SpinalPhrenic NerveRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRespirationRespiration DisordersSpinal Cord InjuriesGABA AntagonistsGlycine AgentsBreathingComplete spinal cord injuryDisinhibitionEpidural stimulationRat

Identifiers

PMID32750492
PMCPMC9793860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.