ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020
Antigenicity prediction and vaccine recommendation of human influenza virus A (H3N2) using convolutional neural networks.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- VirPLM: antigenic prediction of influenza A/H3N2 viruses with a fine-tuned protein language model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- FluNexus: A versatile web platform for antigenic prediction and visualization of influenza A viruses.iMeta · 2026Article
- A CNN-Based Model of Cross-Immunity to Influenza A(H3N2) Virus: Testing Under "Real-World" Conditions.Viruses · 2026Article
- Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Opportunities for machine learning to predict cross-neutralization in FMDV serotype O.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Research Progress of Universal Influenza Vaccine.Vaccines · 2025Review
- PREDAC-FluB: predicting antigenic clusters of seasonal influenza B viruses with protein language model embedding based convolutional neural network.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Sequence-based detection of emerging antigenically novel influenza A viruses.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- MetaFluAD: meta-learning for predicting antigenic distances among influenza viruses.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Seasonal antigenic prediction of influenza A H3N2 using machine learning.Nature communications · 2024Article
- PREDAC-CNN: predicting antigenic clusters of seasonal influenza A viruses with convolutional neural network.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Development of PREDAC-H1pdm to model the antigenic evolution of influenza A/(H1N1) pdm09 viruses.Virologica Sinica · 2023Article
- Article
- Predicting Antigenic Distance from Genetic Data for PRRSV-Type 1: Applications of Machine Learning.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Sequence Matching between Hemagglutinin and Neuraminidase through Sequence Analysis Using Machine Learning.Viruses · 2022Article
- End-to-end antigenic variant generation for H1N1 influenza HA protein using sequence to sequence models.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid evolution of influenza A viruses poses a great challenge to vaccine development. Analytical and machine learning models have been applied to facilitate the process of antigenicity determination. In this study, we designed deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to predict Influenza antigenicity. Our model is the first that systematically analyzed 566 amino acid properties and 141 amino acid substitution matrices for their predictability. We then optimized the structure of the CNNs using particle swarm optimization. The optimal neural networks outperform other predictive models with a blind validation accuracy of 95.8%. Further, we applied our model to vaccine recommendations in the period 1997 to 2011 and contrasted the performance of previous vaccine recommendations using traditional experimental approaches. The results show that our model outperforms the WHO recommendation and other existing models and could potentially improve the vaccine recommendation process. Our results show that WHO often selects virus strains with small variation from year to year and learns slowly and recovers once coverage dips very low. In contrast, the influenza strains selected via our CNN model can differ quite drastically from year to year and exhibit consistently good coverage. In summary, we have designed a comprehensive computational pipeline for optimizing a CNN in the modeling of Influenza A antigenicity and vaccine recommendation. It is more cost and time-effective when compared to traditional hemagglutination inhibition assay analysis. The modeling framework is flexible and can be adopted to study other type of viruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.