Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32750229›Full record

Observational studyCancer medicine2020

Increased curative treatment is associated with decreased prostate cancer-specific and overall mortality in senior adults with high-risk prostate cancer; results from a national registry-based cohort study.

Kirsti Aas, Sophie Dorothea Fosså, Tor Åge Myklebust, Bjørn Møller, Rune Kvåle, Ljiljana Vlatkovic, Viktor Berge

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kirsti AasDepartment of Surgery, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2125-227X
Sophie Dorothea FossåDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Oslo, Norway.
Tor Åge MyklebustCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn MøllerCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Rune KvåleDepartment of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Ljiljana VlatkovicDepartment of Pathology, OUH, Oslo, Norway.
Viktor BergeUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOÅlesund Hospital · NOCancer Registry of Norway · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between curative treatment (CurTrt) and mortality in senior adults (≥70 years) with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is poorly documented. In a population-based cohort we report temporal trends in treatment and PCa-specific mortality (PCSM), investigating the association between CurTrt and mortality in senior adults with high-risk PCa, compared to findings in younger men (<70 years).

methodsObservational study from the Cancer Registry of Norway. Patients with high-risk PCa were stratified for three diagnostic periods (2005-08, 2009-12 and 2013-16), age (<70, vs ≥70) and primary treatment (CurTrt: Radical prostatectomy (RP), Radiotherapy (RAD) vs no curative treatment (NoCurTrt)). Competing risk and Kaplan-Meier methods estimated PCSM and overall mortality (OM), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated odds for CurTrt, and multivariable Fine Gray and Cox regression models evaluated the hazard ratios for PCSM and OM.

resultsOf 19 763 evaluable patients, 54% were aged ≥70 years. Senior adults had more unfavorable PCa characteristics than younger men. Across diagnostic periods, use of CurTrt increased from 15% to 51% in men aged ≥70 and 65% to 81% in men aged < 70 years. With median five years follow-up, PCSM decreased in all patients (P < .05), in the third period restricted to senior adults. In all patients NoCurTrt was associated with three-fold higher 5-year PCSM and two-fold higher OM compared to CurTrt.

conclusionsIn high-risk PCa patients, increased use of CurTrt, greatest in senior men, was observed along with decreased PCSM and OM in both senior and younger adults. CurTrt should increasingly be considered in men ≥70 years.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCause of DeathHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation DosageRegistriesRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorselderlymortalityprostate cancersenior adultstreatment

Identifiers

PMID32750229
PMCPMC7520350
OpenAlexW3047296948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.