Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32750212›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2021

Fine-needle aspiration as an alternative to core needle biopsy for tumour molecular profiling in precision oncology: prospective comparative study of next-generation sequencing in cancer patients included in the SHIVA02 trial.

Célia Dupain, Julien Masliah-Planchon, Céline Gu, Elodie Girard, Pierre Gestraud, Pauline Du Rusquec, Edith Borcoman, Diana Bello, Francesco Ricci, Ségolène Hescot and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03084757 (SHIVA02 - Evaluation of the Efficacy of Targeted Therapy Based on Tumor Molecular Profiling in Patients With Advanced Cancer Using Each Patient as Its Own Control), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03084757 nacompletednot on this map

SHIVA02 - Evaluation of the Efficacy of Targeted Therapy Based on Tumor Molecular Profiling in Patients With Advanced Cancer Using Each Patient as Its Own Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut CurieRan2017 to 2024Enrolled170ConditionsCancer, Solid Tumor, AdultArmsresearch of druggable molecular alterations on tumor biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. ISUOG/ESGO Consensus Statement on ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecological oncology.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Next step of molecular pathology: next-generation sequencing in cytology.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current classification systems and standardized terminology in cytopathology.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Célia DupainDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6248-140X
Julien Masliah-PlanchonDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Céline GuDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Elodie GirardINSERM U900 Research Unit, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France.
Pierre GestraudINSERM U900 Research Unit, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France.
Pauline Du RusquecDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Edith BorcomanDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Diana BelloDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Francesco RicciDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Ségolène HescotDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Marie-Paule SablinDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Patricia TrescaDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Alexandre de MouraDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Delphine LoiratDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Maxime FrelautDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Anne Vincent-SalomonDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Charlotte LecerfDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9186-6314
Céline CallensDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Samantha AntonioDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Coralie FranckDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Odette MarianiDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Ivan BiècheDepartment of Genetics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Maud KamalDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Christophe Le TourneauDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
Vincent ServoisDepartment of Radiology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput molecular profiling of solid tumours using core needle biopsies (CNB) allows the identification of actionable molecular alterations, with around 70% success rate. Although several studies have demonstrated the utility of small biopsy specimens for molecular testing, there remains debate as to the sensitivity of the less invasive fine-needle aspiration (FNA) compared to CNB to detect molecular alterations. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the potential of FNA to detect such alterations in various tumour types as compared to CNB in cancer patients included in the SHIVA02 trial. An in-house amplicon-based targeted sequencing panel (Illumina TSCA 99.3 kb panel covering 87 genes) was used to identify pathogenic variants and gene copy number variations (CNV) in concomitant CNB and FNA samples obtained from 61 patients enrolled in the SHIVA02 trial (NCT03084757). The main tumour types analysed were breast (38%), colon (15%), pancreas (11%), followed by cervix and stomach (7% each). We report 123 molecular alterations (85 variants, 23 amplifications and 15 homozygous deletions) among which 98 (80%) were concordant between CNB and FNA. The remaining discordances were mainly related to deletions status, yet undetected alterations were not exclusively specific to FNA. Comparative analysis of molecular alterations in CNB and FNA showed high concordance in terms of variants as well as CNVs identified. We conclude FNA could therefore be used in routine diagnostics workflow and clinical trials for tumour molecular profiling with the advantages of being minimally invasive and preserve tissue material needed for diagnostic, prognostic or theranostic purposes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPrecision MedicineBiopsy, Fine-NeedleBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA, NeoplasmGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasmsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsDNA, Neoplasmcore biopsyfine-needle aspirationnext-generation sequencingprecision medicineSHIVA02 trialtumour molecular profiling

Identifiers

PMID32750212
PMCPMC7782085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.