Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32750076›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Comparison of microbiota in the cloaca, colon, and magnum of layer chicken.

Seo-Jin Lee, Seongwoo Cho, Tae-Min La, Hong-Jae Lee, Joong-Bok Lee, Seung-Yong Park, Chang-Seon Song, In-Soo Choi, Sang-Won Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gut Microbiota of Ruminants and Monogastric Livestock: An Overview.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seo-Jin LeeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seongwoo ChoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Min LaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hong-Jae LeeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joong-Bok LeeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Yong ParkCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Seon SongCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
In-Soo ChoiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Won LeeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1956-7245
Konkuk University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomically terminal parts of the urinary, reproductive, and digestive systems of birds all connect to the cloaca. As the feces drain through the cloaca in chickens, the cloacal bacteria were previously believed to represent those of the digestive system. To investigate similarities between the cloacal microbiota and the microbiota of the digestive and reproductive systems, microbiota inhabiting the colon, cloaca, and magnum, which is a portion of the chicken oviduct of 34-week-old, specific-pathogen-free hens were analyzed using a 16S rRNA metagenomic approach using the Ion torrent sequencer and the Qiime2 bioinformatics platform. Beta diversity via unweighted and weighted unifrac analyses revealed that the cloacal microbiota was significantly different from those in the colon and the magnum. Unweighted unifrac revealed that the cloacal microbiota was distal from the microbiota in the colon than from the microbiota in the magnum, whereas weighted unifrac revealed that the cloacal microbiota was located further away from the microbiota in the magnum than from the microbiota inhabiting the colon. Pseudomonas spp. were the most abundant in the cloaca, whereas Lactobacillus spp. and Flavobacterium spp. were the most abundant species in the colon and the magnum. The present results indicate that the cloaca contains a mixed population of bacteria, derived from the reproductive, urinary, and digestive systems, particularly in egg-laying hens. Therefore, sampling cloaca to study bacterial populations that inhabit the digestive system of chickens requires caution especially when applied to egg-laying hens. To further understand the physiological role of the microbiota in chicken cloaca, exploratory studies of the chicken's cloacal microbiota should be performed using chickens of different ages and types.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsChickensCloacaColonFemaleFlavobacteriumLactobacillusMetagenomeOviductsPseudomonas

Identifiers

PMID32750076
PMCPMC7402502
OpenAlexW3047337142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.