Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32749635›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2021

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage.

Zain A Sobani, Christina Ling, Tarun Rustagi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: Are we there yet?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zain A SobaniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, MSC10 5550, 1, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA.
Christina LingDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, MSC10 5550, 1, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA.
Tarun RustagiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, MSC10 5550, 1, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA. tarunrustagi06@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8582-011X
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mainstay of management of acute cholecystitis is surgical. Despite the advances in anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery, there is a significant pool of patients that are not candidates for surgery given their significant comorbidities and limited functional reserve. Historically percutaneous gallbladder drainage has been utilized to temporize these patients. Recently, endoscopic approaches are being explored with transpapillary and transmural drainage. In this article, we discuss the background, current status, technical challenges, adverse events, and outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for management of acute cholecystitis.

Indexed as

EndosonographySurgery, Computer-AssistedCholecystitis, AcuteDrainageGallbladderHumansTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalAcute cholecystitisEndoscopic gallbladder drainageEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS)High-risk patientsLAMSLumen-apposing metal stentsTransmural

Identifiers

PMID32749635
OpenAlexW3047046942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.