ArticleGenetica2020
Genetic diversity of native and introduced Phragmites (common reed) in Wisconsin.
Article in Genetica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- At the edge of change: Native Phragmites persistence and nonnative arrival along the dam-regulated Colorado River.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- Molecular methods for differentiatingApplications in plant sciences · 2026Article
- Establishment of Novel Simple Sequence Repeat Markers inBiology · 2025Article
- Optimization and application of non-native Phragmites australis transcriptome assemblies.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two subspecies of common reed (Phragmites australis; Poaceae) exist in northern North America: the native P. australis subsp. americanus and the introduced P. australis subsp. australis. There are numerous native populations in Wisconsin, in addition to the more recently established populations of the introduced subspecies. We studied populations of both P. australis subspecies across Wisconsin in order to characterize the genetic diversity of both subspecies and to investigate whether any instances of hybridization could be ascertained in Wisconsin. Using eight microsatellite markers, we found minimal overlap in the alleles that could be recovered from native and introduced plants, and we found no evidence to suggest hybridization between subspecies, even in localities where native and introduced plants grow in close proximity. Overall, we found greater genetic variation in plants of the introduced subspecies relative to the native subspecies, and we observed some geographic patterns of allelic diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.