ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2021
Ultrastructure of a late-stage bacterial endocarditis valve vegetation.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Loss of Fsr quorum sensing promotes biofilm formation and worsens outcomes in enterococcal infective endocarditis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Infective Endocarditis by Biofilm-Producing Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Rheumatic heart disease of the mitral valve alongside the papillary fibroelastoma of the aortic valve: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Diflunisal and Analogue Pharmacophores Mediating Suppression of Virulence Phenotypes inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Role of Platelets in Infective Endocarditis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Neutrophils Protect AgainstArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a severe illness with high mortality rate, despite advances in antibiotic therapy and cardiac surgery. If infectious bacteria and platelets are two key players of human IE vegetation developmental process, their interactions and respective roles in fully developed late-stage IE vegetations remain obscure. The objective of this study was to better understand the organization of the different components of the IE vegetation and to provide a detailed description of this vegetation ultrastructure. A late stage Staphylococcal endocarditic vegetation was provided from a 13 years teenager patient. After reception of the surgical piece, we carried out a histological study using routine methods, notably the hematoxylin-eosin-saffron staining. Labeling with the anti-CD 61 antibody was also carried out. In a second step, we used transmission electron microscopy to describe the different regions making up the vegetation. Our ultrastructural study revealed vegetation was clearly composed by three different regions and identified the specific location of the bacteria and platelets in the vegetation tissues. Histological analysis showed that platelets and Staphylococcus aureus were not co-localized. Electron microscopy study confirmed that S. aureus were found at distance from platelets, as well from immune cells, embedded in a biofilm and/or a necrotic area. These results reveal a development of a deep bacteria-only niche in vegetation, raising questions about medication access to these microorganisms. Vegetation composed of three regions: a region rich in bacteria incorporated into the necrotic tissue, the second region composed of fibrin filaments and the third region rich in platelets and free of bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32749620What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.