Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32749618›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Vertebroplasty shows no antitumoral effect on vertebral metastasis: a case-based study on anatomopathological examinations.

Alberto Balestrino, Stefano Boriani, Riccardo Cecchinato, Antonina Parafioriti, Marco Gambarotti, Alessandro Gasbarrini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. What's new in the management of metastatic bone disease.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto BalestrinoGSpine4, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.
Stefano BorianiGSpine4, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.
Riccardo CecchinatoGSpine4, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy. dott.cecchinato@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3570-8178
Antonina ParafioritiDepartment of Pathology, Orthopaedic Institute Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy.
Marco GambarottiDepartment of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro GasbarriniDepartment of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITIstituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePercutaneous vertebroplasty (VTP) is a well-known surgical technique used for pain management and vertebral consolidation in the treatment of osteolytic metastases of the spine. While this indication is proven and commonly accepted, an antitumoral effect of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been proposed but not yet demonstrated. The aim of our study is to evaluate the evidences of antitumoral effect on anatomopathological examination. We present a small series of pathology findings after VTP for spine metastases that support the lack of antitumoral effect of PMMA.

methodsWe have retrospectively analyzed three cases of patients treated for en bloc excision of recurrent spine metastases previously submitted elsewhere to VTP on the same levels. We discuss our results with the literature reporting of an antitumoral effect of VTP.

resultsIn our series, after anatomopathological examination, a cement-induced tumor necrosis was never found. Conversely, a foreign-body reaction around the cement was found, inside vital tumor. These results are consistent with an immune reaction to a foreign body without evidences of an antitumoral effect of PMMA.

conclusionThe antitumoral effect of PMMA should not be taken into account as an indication for VTP in spinal metastases. It is important not to misuse VTP as a therapy aiming at tumor control. Other therapies such as radiotherapy, radiosurgery and open surgery are available for that purpose.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSpinal FracturesVertebroplastyBone CementsHumansPolymethyl MethacrylateRetrospective StudiesSpineTreatment OutcomeBone CementsPolymethyl MethacrylateAntitumoral effectCytotoxicityPMMASpinal metastasisTumorVertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32749618
OpenAlexW3047117916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.