Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32749604›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

A comparative study on the effects of flexible and rigid laryngoscopy techniques on intraocular pressure.

Ender Sahin, Murat Serkan Songur

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ender SahinDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Bozok University, Atatürk Yolu 7. Km, 66100, Yozgat, Turkey. dr.endersahin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0798-0393
Murat Serkan SongurDepartment of Ophtalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6234-3680
Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study compared the impact of transoral rigid laryngoscopy (TORL) and transnasal flexible laryngoscopy (TNFL) methods on intraocular pressure (IOP).

methodsThis study included 100 patients, with 50 patients undergoing a TORL, and 50 patients a TNFL. Before procedure IOP values were recorded by an ophthalmologist using Icare Pro tonometry, also immediately post procedure, and at the 15th, 30th and 60th minute after laryngoscopy.

resultsBoth groups were similar in terms of age, gender, mean body mass index (BMI), and pre-laryngoscopy IOP values. When the TNFL and TORL groups were compared, no significant differences were observed between pre-laryngoscopy, and 60

conclusionsWe demonstrated higher IOP fluctuations in the TORL group, when compared to the TNFL group. For this reason, TNFL may be considered a safer method for evaluating laryngeal tissues in conditions that require lower IOP fluctuation as in glaucoma. However, further studies are required to clarify the exact effects of IOP fluctuations during TNFL and TORL in patients with glaucoma.

Indexed as

Intraocular PressureAdultFemaleGlaucomaHumansLaryngoscopyLarynxMaleProspective StudiesTonometry, OcularFlexible laryngoscopyGag reflexGlaucomaIntraocular pressureRigid laryngoscopy

Identifiers

PMID32749604
OpenAlexW3047184493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.