SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2021
Is the Da Vinci Xi system a real improvement for oncologic transoral robotic surgery? A systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Experience in Transoral Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Subjects: A Systematic Literature Review.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Interim Phase II Results Using Panitumumab-IRDye800CW during Transoral Robotic Surgery in Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Trial
- Robot-assisted oropharyngeal cancer surgery using the da Vinci SP system: a step-by-step case presentation.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Initial clinical experience with the da Vinci 5 in transoral robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- A Full-Range Proximity-Tactile Sensor Based on Multimodal Perception Fusion for Minimally Invasive Surgical Robots.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: A Review.Cancer informatics · 2025Review
- Feasibility of transoral robotic surgery using the da Vinci Xi system for oropharyngeal cancer and obstructive sleep apnea in low-volume center.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Overall survival, disease-free survival and quality of life in patients affected by HPV mediated p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with upfront trans-oral robotic surgery vs radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Article
- Transoral Robotic Surgery in the Management of Submandibular Gland Sialoliths: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Feasibility and safety of the da Vinci Xi surgical robot for transoral robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- R2 advances in robotic-assisted spine surgery: comparative analysis of options, future directions, and bibliometric analysis of the literature.Neurosurgical review · 2022Review
- Review
- Utilization of Silicone Sheet as a Protective Guide During Transoral Robotic Tongue Base Surgery.OTO openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we reviewed the current literature about TORS procedures performed with Xi system and we discussed the pros and cons of this robotic system comparing it to the previous Si model. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for adequate published studies about TORS procedure performed with da Vinci Si and Xi models. Five papers on the TORS-Xi procedures met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. These papers showed results based on 74 subjects (mean age 60.51 ± 4.55 years old). The most common TORS procedure was performed to address the oropharynx (65 procedures). One case (1.35%) of a tongue base tumor was converted into a transmandibular approach. One subject (1.35%) had a positive margin, while two subjects (2.7%) had close/uncertain margins at final histology. Nine papers on the TORS-Si procedures met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. These papers showed results based on 128 subjects (mean age 59.79 ± 5.93 years old). The most common TORS procedure was performed to address the oropharynx (90 procedures). Three procedures (2.34%) were aborted due to inadequate exposure of the tumor. None of the subject had positive margins, while three subjects (2.34%) had close/uncertain margins at final histology. Despite its improved vision, easier docking and narrower robotic arms, the da Vinci Xi system has structural peculiarities that limit its applications for certain TORS procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32749569What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.