ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020
A comprehensive hierarchical classification based on multi-features of breast DCE-MRI for cancer diagnosis.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving signal-to-noise ratio by maximal convolution of longitudinal and transverse magnetization components in MRI: application to the breast cancer detection.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Emerging methods for prostate cancer imaging: evaluating cancer structure and metabolic alterations more clearly.Molecular oncology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is widely used for early diagnosis of breast cancer. The commonly used morphological feature (MF), dynamic feature (DF), and texture feature (TF) from breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) have been proved very valuable and are studied in this paper. However, previous studies ignored the prior knowledge that most of the benign lesions have clearer and smoother edges than malignant ones. Therefore, two new TFs are proposed. To obtain an optimal feature subset and an accurate classification result, feature selection is applied in this paper. Moreover, most existing CAD models with simple structure only focus on common lesions and ignore hard-to-spot lesions so that a satisfied performance can be obtained for common lesions but there are some contradictions for those hard-to-spot lesions. Therefore, in this paper, a comprehensive hierarchical model is proposed to deal with contradictions and predict all kinds of lesions. The experimental result shows that the new features obviously increase ACC of TF from 0.7788 to 0.8584 and feature selection increases ACC of DF form 0.6991 to 0.7345. More importantly, compared with the existing CAD models and deep learning method, the proposed model which provides a higher performance for both common and hard-to-spot lesions significantly increases the classification performance with sensitivity of 0.9452 and specificity of 0.9000. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.