Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32749552›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

"The More They Know, the Better Care They Can Give": Patient Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care.

Francesca M Nicosia, Malena J Spar, Alicia Neumann, Molly C Silvestrini, Maureen Barrientos, Rebecca T Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca M Nicosia *San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA. Francesca.nicosia@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4040-7625
Malena J Spar *San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alicia NeumannDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine of the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Molly C SilvestriniSan Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Maureen BarrientosSan Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rebecca T BrownGeriatrics and Extended Care, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Louise C. Walter · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
Clinical and Transtional Science InstituteKL2TR000143 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$11.9M
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Premature Geriatrics SyndromesK23AG045290 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BROWN, REBECCA TYLER · 2014 to 2018
$882k
Improving Aging in Place for Older Adults Living in Subsidized HousingK76AG057016 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BROWN, REBECCA TYLER · 2018 to 2020
$853k
Measurement Science QUERI ProgramIP1HX002002 · VA · VETERANS AFFAIRS MED CTR SAN FRANCISCO · PI BROWN, REBECCA TYLER, KALTENBACH, TONYA R · 2020 to 2020
–
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000143NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000143NIA NIH HHS K23AG045290NIA NIH HHS K76 AG057016NIA NIH HHS K76AG057016NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281NIA NIH HHS P30AG044281VA QUE 15-283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite its importance to care and outcomes for older adults, functional status is seldom routinely measured in primary care. Understanding patient perspectives is necessary to develop effective, patient-centered approaches for measuring function, yet we know little about patient views on this topic.

objectiveTo examine patient and caregiver perspectives on measuring activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs).

designQualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

participantsTwenty-eight patients aged 65 or older and five caregivers in primary care clinics at one Veterans Affairs Medical Center. APPROACH: We conducted interviews to elicit patient and caregiver perspectives on the importance of measuring function, including preferences for method of screening and assessment, wording of questions, and provider communication style. We analyzed interviews using qualitative thematic analysis. KEY

resultsWe identified several themes related to measuring function in primary care. First, most participants reported that measuring function is part of quality, holistic care. However, a minority of participants noted that discussing function, especially IADLs, was not medically relevant. Second, in terms of preferences for measuring function, participants noted that interdisciplinary approaches to measuring function are optimal and that face-to-face assessment is most "intimate" and can prompt reflection on one's limitations. However, some participants indicated that self-assessment is less invasive than in-person assessment. Third, participants had varied preferences regarding communicating about function. Participants noted that asking about difficulty with activities versus need for help are distinct and complementary concepts and that providing context is essential when discussing sensitive topics such as functional decline.

conclusionsMost patients and caregivers reported that measuring function was important, preferred face-to-face assessment, and emphasized the importance of providing context when asking about function. These findings suggest that incorporating patient and caregiver preferences for measuring function can improve satisfaction and experience with functional assessment in primary care.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingFunctional StatusAgedCaregiversHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchfunctional assessmentfunctional statusolder adultsprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID32749552
PMCPMC7573015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.