Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32749222›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Assessment of the Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks in Labeling Noise by Using Chest X-Ray Images From Multiple Centers.

Ryoungwoo Jang, Namkug Kim, Miso Jang, Kyung Hwa Lee, Sang Min Lee, Kyung Hee Lee, Han Na Noh, Joon Beom Seo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Explainable & Safe Artificial Intelligence in Radiology].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning with noisy labels in medical prediction problems: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  5. Comparative Analysis of Fusion Strategies for Imaging and Non-imaging Data - Use-case of Hospital Discharge Prediction.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryoungwoo JangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-7469
Namkug KimDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-2217
Miso JangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4409-411X
Kyung Hwa LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3826-8451
Sang Min LeeDepartment of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7627-2000
Kyung Hee LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2248-2525
Han Na NohDepartment of Health Screening and Promotion Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6887-7878
Joon Beom SeoDepartment of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0271-7884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputer-aided diagnosis on chest x-ray images using deep learning is a widely studied modality in medicine. Many studies are based on public datasets, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) dataset and the Stanford CheXpert dataset. However, these datasets are preprocessed by classical natural language processing, which may cause a certain extent of label errors.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the robustness of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for binary classification of posteroanterior chest x-ray through random incorrect labeling.

methodsWe trained and validated the CNN architecture with different noise levels of labels in 3 datasets, namely, Asan Medical Center-Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (AMC-SNUBH), NIH, and CheXpert, and tested the models with each test set. Diseases of each chest x-ray in our dataset were confirmed by a thoracic radiologist using computed tomography (CT). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated in each test. Randomly chosen chest x-rays of public datasets were evaluated by 3 physicians and 1 thoracic radiologist.

resultsIn comparison with the public datasets of NIH and CheXpert, where AUCs did not significantly drop to 16%, the AUC of the AMC-SNUBH dataset significantly decreased from 2% label noise. Evaluation of the public datasets by 3 physicians and 1 thoracic radiologist showed an accuracy of 65%-80%.

conclusionsThe deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis model is sensitive to label noise, and computer-aided diagnosis with inaccurate labels is not credible. Furthermore, open datasets such as NIH and CheXpert need to be distilled before being used for deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis.

Indexed as

CheXpert datasetconvolutional neural networkdeep learningNIH datasetrobustness

Identifiers

PMID32749222
PMCPMC7435602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.