Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32749198›Full record

ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2021

A further look at ageing and word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from one-character words.

Sainan Zhao, Lin Li, Min Chang, Jingxin Wang, Kevin B Paterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Syntactic prediction during self-paced reading is age invariant.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sainan ZhaoAcademy of Psychology and Behavior, Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Lin LiAcademy of Psychology and Behavior, Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Min ChangAcademy of Psychology and Behavior, Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Jingxin WangAcademy of Psychology and Behavior, Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4225-815X
Kevin B PatersonDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behavior, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-8628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults are thought to compensate for slower lexical processing by making greater use of contextual knowledge, relative to young adults, to predict words in sentences. Accordingly, compared to young adults, older adults should produce larger contextual predictability effects in reading times and skipping rates for words. Empirical support for this account is nevertheless scarce. Perhaps the clearest evidence to date comes from a recent Chinese study showing larger word predictability effects for older adults in reading times but not skipping rates for two-character words. However, one possibility is that the absence of a word-skipping effect in this experiment was due to the older readers skipping words infrequently because of difficulty processing two-character words parafoveally. We therefore took a further look at this issue, using one-character target words to boost word-skipping. Young (18-30  years) and older (65+ years) adults read sentences containing a target word that was either highly predictable or less predictable from the prior sentence context. Our results replicate the finding that older adults produce larger word predictability effects in reading times but not word-skipping, despite high skipping rates. We discuss these findings in relation to ageing effects on reading in different writing systems.

Indexed as

AttentionAgedAgingChinaEye MovementsHumansLanguageChineseCognitive ageingeye movements during readingword predictability

Identifiers

PMID32749198
PMCPMC7745612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.