ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020
Hospital-based intervention to enhance hypertension diagnosis in Kalasin hospital, Thailand, 2017-2019: A pre-post pilot intervention study.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation of a learning health system for the management of non-communicable diseases in Thailand: a realist evaluation protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Hospital-based intervention to enhance hypertension diagnosis in Kalasin hospital, Thailand, 2017-2019: A pre-post pilot intervention study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Thailand 5.9 million individuals ≥15 years old have undiagnosed hypertension. The intervention to reduce undiagnosed hypertension was piloted and aimed to compare pre- and post-intervention hypertension diagnosis rate and follow-up rate. A hospital-based pre- and post-intervention study was piloted in a general hospital in Thailand. The intervention included an electronic pop-up alert when raised blood pressure was observed and a follow-up protocol. The follow-up protocol entered patient information in a follow-up book that scheduled an appointment to recheck blood pressure. Statistical analyses compared the rate of hypertension diagnosis and follow-up between the pre- and post-intervention periods, adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics. A post-intervention, self-report survey among nurses and nurse-aids explored perceptions about raised blood pressure management and solicited suggestions to improve the intervention. 574 raised blood pressure patients visited the hospital in the pre-intervention period; 27.4% returned for follow--up; and hypertension diagnosis rate was 1.4%. Among 686 post-intervention raised blood pressure patients, overall hypertension diagnosis rate improved to 6.1%. In per-protocol patients, 81.9% were booked to follow--up, hypertension diagnosis rate was 18.6%, and the adjusted odds ratio of hypertension diagnosis was 4.5 times higher compared with the pre-intervention period. By self-report, 20% of health workers had no time to provide the follow-up book due to work overload, yet >57% reported that information technology improved detection of raised blood pressure and improved follow-up. The interventions significantly increased the hypertension diagnosis rate and follow-up among raised blood pressure patients in a single hospital but may benefit from incorporating an information technology-assisted follow-up protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.