Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748998›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2020

US State Policies, Politics, and Life Expectancy.

Jennifer Karas Montez, Jason Beckfield, Julene Kemp Cooney, Jacob M Grumbach, Mark D Hayward, Huseyin Zeyd Koytak, Steven H Woolf, Anna Zajacova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Heterogeneous and racialized impacts of state incarceration policies on birth outcomes in the United States.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Insights into US life expectancy stagnation from birth cohort mortality dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer Karas MontezSyracuse University.
Jason BeckfieldHarvard University.
Julene Kemp CooneySyracuse University.
Jacob M GrumbachUniversity of Washington.
Mark D HaywardUniversity of Texas at Austin.
Huseyin Zeyd KoytakSyracuse University.
Steven H WoolfVirginia Commonwealth University.
Anna ZajacovaUniversity of Western Ontario.

Funding

Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Network on Life Course Health Dynamics and Disparities in 21st Century America RenewalR24AG045061 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JENNIFER A AILSHIRE, Sarah A. Burgard · 2014 to 2026
$5.2M
Center for Aging and Policy Studies (CAPS) Core D: External Research Resources Support and Dissemination CoreP30AG066583 · NIA · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI WILMOTH, JANET M · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
Educational Attainment, Geography, and U.S. Adult Mortality RiskR01AG055481 · NIA · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI MONTEZ, JENNIFER KARAS · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066583NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055481NIA NIH HHS R24 AG045061NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy Points Changes in US state policies since the 1970s, particularly after 2010, have played an important role in the stagnation and recent decline in US life expectancy. Some US state policies appear to be key levers for improving life expectancy, such as policies on tobacco, labor, immigration, civil rights, and the environment. US life expectancy is estimated to be 2.8 years longer among women and 2.1 years longer among men if all US states enjoyed the health advantages of states with more liberal policies, which would put US life expectancy on par with other high-income countries. CONTEXT: Life expectancy in the United States has increased little in previous decades, declined in recent years, and become more unequal across US states. Those trends were accompanied by substantial changes in the US policy environment, particularly at the state level. State policies affect nearly every aspect of people's lives, including economic well-being, social relationships, education, housing, lifestyles, and access to medical care. This study examines the extent to which the state policy environment may have contributed to the troubling trends in US life expectancy.

methodsWe merged annual data on life expectancy for US states from 1970 to 2014 with annual data on 18 state-level policy domains such as tobacco, environment, tax, and labor. Using the 45 years of data and controlling for differences in the characteristics of states and their populations, we modeled the association between state policies and life expectancy, and assessed how changes in those policies may have contributed to trends in US life expectancy from 1970 through 2014.

findingsResults show that changes in life expectancy during 1970-2014 were associated with changes in state policies on a conservative-liberal continuum, where more liberal policies expand economic regulations and protect marginalized groups. States that implemented more conservative policies were more likely to experience a reduction in life expectancy. We estimated that the shallow upward trend in US life expectancy from 2010 to 2014 would have been 25% steeper for women and 13% steeper for men had state policies not changed as they did. We also estimated that US life expectancy would be 2.8 years longer among women and 2.1 years longer among men if all states enjoyed the health advantages of states with more liberal policies.

conclusionsUnderstanding and reversing the troubling trends and growing inequalities in US life expectancy requires attention to US state policy contexts, their dynamic changes in recent decades, and the forces behind those changes. Changes in US political and policy contexts since the 1970s may undergird the deterioration of Americans' health and longevity.

Indexed as

Health PolicyLife ExpectancyPoliticsState GovernmentAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGovernment RegulationHumansMaleSex FactorsUnited Stateshealth disparitieslife expectancysocial determinants of healthUS state policies

Identifiers

PMID32748998
PMCPMC7482386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.