Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748884›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Validation of the Women's Views of Birth Labor Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ4) in the Spanish Population.

María Dolores Pozo-Cano, Adelina Martín-Salvador, María Ángeles Pérez-Morente, Encarnación Martínez-García, Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo, María Gázquez-López, Rafael Fernández-Castillo, Inmaculada García-García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Relegated Goal of Health Institutions: Sexual and Reproductive Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

María Dolores Pozo-CanoFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Adelina Martín-SalvadorFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 52005 Melilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3852-9861
María Ángeles Pérez-MorenteFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaen, Spain.
Encarnación Martínez-GarcíaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0372-7072
Juan de Dios Luna Del CastilloFaculty of Medicine, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
María Gázquez-LópezFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 51001 Ceuta, Spain.
Rafael Fernández-CastilloFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1814-5254
Inmaculada García-GarcíaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The satisfaction of women with the birth experience has implications for the health and wellness of the women themselves and also of their newborn baby. The objectives of this study were to determine the factor structure of the Women's Views of Birth Labor Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ4) questionnaire on satisfaction with the attention received during birth delivery in Spanish women and to compare the level of satisfaction of pregnant women during the birth process with that in other studies that validated this instrument. A cross-sectional study using a self-completed questionnaire of 385 Spanish-speaking puerperal women who gave birth in the Public University Hospitals of Granada (Spain) was conducted. An exploratory factor analysis of the WOMBLSQ4 questionnaire was performed to identify the best fit model. Those items that showed commonalities higher than 0.50 were kept in the questionnaire. Using the principal components method, nine factors with eigenvalues greater than one were extracted after merging pain-related factors into a single item. These factors explain 90% of the global variance, indicating the high internal consistency of the full scale. In the model resulting from the WOMBLSQ4 questionnaire, its nine dimensions measure the levels of satisfaction of puerperal women with childbirth care. Average scores somewhat higher than those of the original questionnaire and close to those achieved in the study carried out in Madrid (Spain) were obtained. In clinical practice, this scale may be relevant for measuring the levels of satisfaction during childbirth of Spanish-speaking women.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornLabor, ObstetricParturitionPregnancyPrenatal CareReproducibility of ResultsSpainSurveys and Questionnairesbirth attentionpatient satisfactionsatisfaction questionnairevalidation study

Identifiers

PMID32748884
PMCPMC7432014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.