Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748779›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020

An In-Depth Examination of Reasons for Autopsy Acceptance and Refusal in Northern Tanzania.

Lauren S Blum, Francis P Karia, Elizabeth F Msoka, Martha Oshosen Mwanga, John A Crump, Matthew P Rubach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Self-Rated Competence of Ugandan Healthcare Workers to Obtain Informed Consent for Autopsy.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Performance of Xpert Ultra nasopharyngeal swab for identification of tuberculosis deaths in northern Tanzania.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren S Blum1Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Francis P Karia2Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.
Elizabeth F Msoka3Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Martha Oshosen Mwanga3Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
John A Crump4Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew P Rubach4Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Investigating Febrile Deaths in Tanzania (INDITe)R01AI121378 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RUBACH, MATTHEW P · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
Viral Zoonoses and Severe Febrile Illness in Northern TanzaniaK23AI116869 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RUBACH, MATTHEW P · 2016 to 2020
$896k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI116869NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncertainty about the causes of death (COD) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been recognized as a constraint to global health and development. Although complete diagnostic autopsy (CDA) is the best way to assess COD, it is uncommon in LMICs because of low investment priority and assumptions about poor acceptability. Social science research was conducted from May 2016 through July 2017 to examine issues related to acceptability of CDAs in northern Tanzania where autopsy was being offered in two referral hospitals to assess COD associated with febrile illness. Initial formative research entailed 29 key informant interviews, seven observations of burial practices, and four group discussions. In-depth interviews were conducted with families of deceased, including nine families that accepted and 11 families that refused CDA. The formative research identified concepts related to death, understandings of CDA, and cultural practices and psychosocial considerations associated with death that informed the authorization process. Most families who accepted CDA cited the desire to get clarity regarding the COD as a primary reason for acceptance. An unexpected finding was that CDA is perceived as a means to determine witchcraft involvement, a common explanation for COD and a common reason for postmortem acceptance. Death resulting from chronic illness or conditions presumed to have a clinical diagnosis were reasons for CDA to be viewed as unnecessary. The timing, way families were approached, and content of information shared during authorization influenced acceptance and refusal of CDA. Findings show that CDAs can be acceptable in settings where traditional disease models prevail.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathAdolescentAdultAutopsyChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationTanzaniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32748779
PMCPMC7543794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.