Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748730›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & misuse2020

Syringe Service Program Utilization, Barriers, and Preferences for Design in Rural Appalachia: Differences between Men and Women Who Inject Drugs.

Kathryn E Lancaster, Hannah L F Cooper, Christopher R Browning, Carlos D Malvestutto, John F P Bridges, April M Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & misuse, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathryn E LancasterDivision of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Hannah L F CooperDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Christopher R BrowningDepartment of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Carlos D MalvestuttoDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
John F P BridgesDepartments of Biomedical Informatics and Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
April M YoungDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Funding

Kentucky Communities and Researchers Engaging to Halt the Opioid Epidemic (CARE2HOPE)UH3DA044798 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI COOPER, HANNAH LF, YOUNG, APRIL MARIE · 2019 to 2022
$4.4M
Kentucky Communities & Researchers Engaging to Halt the Opioid Epidemic-CARE2HOPEUG3DA044798 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI COOPER, HANNAH LF, YOUNG, APRIL MARIE · 2017 to 2018
$1.3M
The role of injection partnerships and preferences for reducing HCV risk: Giving a voice to young women in rural Appalachia.K01DA048174 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LANCASTER, KATHRYN ELIZABETH · 2019 to 2023
$841k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA048174NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044798NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA044798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AdultAppalachian RegionFemaleHumansKentuckyMaleNeedle-Exchange ProgramsSex FactorsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousSyringesYoung AdultAppalachiagenderharm reductionNeedle exchange programspeople who inject drugsrural

Identifiers

PMID32748730
PMCPMC7584727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.