ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2020
Domain interactions determine the conformational ensemble of the periplasmic chaperone SurA.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integration of Membrane Proteins into the Outer Membrane of Diderm Bacteria by the BAM Complex.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Dual client binding sites in the ATP-independent chaperone SurA.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Outer membrane protein assembly mediated by BAM-SurA complexes.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Strong non-ideality effects at low protein concentrations: considerations for elongated proteins.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2023Article
- FkpA enhances membrane protein folding using an extensive interaction surface.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- SurA-like and Skp-like Proteins as Important Virulence Determinants of the Gram Negative Bacterial Pathogens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Dynamic interplay between the periplasmic chaperone SurA and the BAM complex in outer membrane protein folding.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Mechanism of activation and the rewired network: New drug design concepts.Medicinal research reviews · 2022Review
- Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins Are Targeted to the Bam Complex by Two Parallel Mechanisms.mBio · 2021Article
- How do Chaperones Bind (Partly) Unfolded Client Proteins?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- SurA is a cryptically grooved chaperone that expands unfolded outer membrane proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Domain interactions determine the conformational ensemble of the periplasmic chaperone SurA.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
SurA is thought to be the most important periplasmic chaperone for outer membrane protein (OMP) biogenesis. Its structure is composed of a core region and two peptidylprolyl isomerase domains, termed P1 and P2, connected by flexible linkers. As such these three independent folding units are able to adopt a number of distinct spatial positions with respect to each other. The conformational dynamics of these domains are thought to be functionally important yet are largely unresolved. Here we address this question of the conformational ensemble using sedimentation equilibrium, small-angle neutron scattering, and folding titrations. This combination of orthogonal methods converges on a SurA population that is monomeric at physiological concentrations. The conformation that dominates this population has the P1 and core domains docked to one another, for example, "P1-closed" and the P2 domain extended in solution. We discovered that the distribution of domain orientations is defined by modest and favorable interactions between the core domain and either the P1 or the P2 domains. These two peptidylprolyl domains compete with each other for core-binding but are thermodynamically uncoupled. This arrangement implies two novel insights. Firstly, an open conformation must exist to facilitate P1 and P2 exchange on the core, indicating that the open client-binding conformation is populated at low levels even in the absence of client unfolded OMPs. Secondly, competition between P1 and P2 binding paradoxically occludes the client binding site on the core, which may serve to preserve the reservoir of binding-competent apo-SurA in the periplasm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.