Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32748422›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2020

Domain interactions determine the conformational ensemble of the periplasmic chaperone SurA.

Dagan C Marx, Mathis J Leblanc, Ashlee M Plummer, Susan Krueger, Karen G Fleming

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. FkpA enhances membrane protein folding using an extensive interaction surface.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. How do Chaperones Bind (Partly) Unfolded Client Proteins?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  11. SurA is a cryptically grooved chaperone that expands unfolded outer membrane proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Domain interactions determine the conformational ensemble of the periplasmic chaperone SurA.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dagan C MarxThomas C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mathis J LeblancThomas C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ashlee M PlummerThomas C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Susan KruegerNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Karen G FlemingThomas C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5417-8830
Johns Hopkins University · USHarvard University · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

PROGRAM IN MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICST32GM008403 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BARRICK, DOUGLAS E. · 1990 to 2019
$13.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SurA is thought to be the most important periplasmic chaperone for outer membrane protein (OMP) biogenesis. Its structure is composed of a core region and two peptidylprolyl isomerase domains, termed P1 and P2, connected by flexible linkers. As such these three independent folding units are able to adopt a number of distinct spatial positions with respect to each other. The conformational dynamics of these domains are thought to be functionally important yet are largely unresolved. Here we address this question of the conformational ensemble using sedimentation equilibrium, small-angle neutron scattering, and folding titrations. This combination of orthogonal methods converges on a SurA population that is monomeric at physiological concentrations. The conformation that dominates this population has the P1 and core domains docked to one another, for example, "P1-closed" and the P2 domain extended in solution. We discovered that the distribution of domain orientations is defined by modest and favorable interactions between the core domain and either the P1 or the P2 domains. These two peptidylprolyl domains compete with each other for core-binding but are thermodynamically uncoupled. This arrangement implies two novel insights. Firstly, an open conformation must exist to facilitate P1 and P2 exchange on the core, indicating that the open client-binding conformation is populated at low levels even in the absence of client unfolded OMPs. Secondly, competition between P1 and P2 binding paradoxically occludes the client binding site on the core, which may serve to preserve the reservoir of binding-competent apo-SurA in the periplasm.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationCarrier ProteinsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsNeutron DiffractionPeptidylprolyl IsomeraseProtein DomainsScattering, Small AngleCarrier ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsPeptidylprolyl IsomeraseSurA protein, E coliconformational dynamicsEscherichia coli periplasmic chaperonesouter membrane protein biogenesisSurA protein

Identifiers

PMID32748422
PMCPMC7513704
OpenAlexW3047223577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.